Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37294522›Full record

ArticleOphthalmology and therapy2023

Efficacy of Simulator-Based Slit Lamp Training for Medical Students: A Prospective, Randomized Trial.

Svenja Deuchler, Yaser Abu Dail, Frank Koch, Claudia Buedel, Hanns Ackermann, Elias Flockerzi, Berthold Seitz

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ophthalmology and therapy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. The Utility of Virtual Reality in Ophthalmology: A Review.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2025
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Svenja DeuchlerAugenzentrum Frankfurt, Georg-Baumgarten-Straße 3, 60549, Frankfurt am Main, Germany. s.deuchler@icloud.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2758-4910
Yaser Abu DailDepartment of Ophthalmology, Saarland University Medical Center, 66424, Homburg/Saar, Germany.
Frank KochAugenzentrum Frankfurt, Georg-Baumgarten-Straße 3, 60549, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Claudia BuedelAugenzentrum Frankfurt, Georg-Baumgarten-Straße 3, 60549, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Hanns AckermannInstitute of Biostatistics, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Elias FlockerziDepartment of Ophthalmology, Saarland University Medical Center, 66424, Homburg/Saar, Germany.
Berthold SeitzDepartment of Ophthalmology, Saarland University Medical Center, 66424, Homburg/Saar, Germany.
Saarland University · DEGoethe University Frankfurt · DEGeorg Speyer Haus · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionSimulation training has an important role in medical education. In ophthalmology, simulation-based training has been shown to be significantly effective for surgical and diagnostic training in direct and indirect ophthalmoscopy. In this study, we analysed the effects of simulator-based slit lamp training.

methodsIn this prospective controlled trial, medical students in their eighth semester at Saarland University Medical Center (n = 24) who had attended a 1-week ophthalmological internship were randomized into two groups: The traditional group (n = 12) was examined directly after the 1-week internship; the simulator group (n = 12) was trained with the slit lamp simulator before passing an objective structured clinical examination (OSCE). A masked ophthalmological faculty trainer assessed the students' slit lamp skills (maximum total score 42 points [pts]): preparation (5 pts), clinical examination (9.5 pts), assessment of findings (9.5 pts), diagnosis (3 pts), commentary on the examination approach (8 pts), measurement of structures (2 pts) and recognition of five diagnoses (5 pts). All students completed post-assessment surveys. Examination grades and survey responses were compared between the groups.

resultsThe overall performance of the slit lamp OSCE was significantly better (p < 0.001) in the simulator group than in the traditional group (29.75 [7.88] vs. 17.00 [4.75]) with significantly higher scores for the preparation and assessment of slit lamp controls (5.0 [0.0] vs. 3.0 [3.5]; p = 0.008) and localization of relevant structures (6.75 [3.13] vs. 4.0 [1.5]; p = 0.008). Consistently higher scores, but not significant, were assigned for the description of structures found (4.5 [3.38] vs. 3.25 [2.13]; p = 0.09) and the correct diagnosis (3.0 [0.0] vs. 3.0 [0.0]; p = 0.48). Surveys reflected the students' subjectively perceived knowledge gain during the simulator training for slit lamp illumination techniques (p = 0.002), recognition (p < 0.001), and assessment of the correct localization of pathologies (p < 0.001).

conclusionSlit lamp examination is an important diagnostic method in ophthalmology. Simulator-based training improved students' examination techniques for localizing anatomical structures and pathological lesions. The transfer of theoretical knowledge into practice can be achieved in a stress-free atmosphere.

Indexed as

EducationOphthalmologySimulationSlit lampVirtual reality

Identifiers

PMID37294522
PMCPMC10287863
OpenAlexW4379966974

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.