Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37294472›Full record

ArticleClinical autonomic research : official journal of the Clinical Autonomic Research Society2023

Heart rate variability between hormone phases of the menstrual and oral contraceptive pill cycles of young women.

Emily F Blake, Lauren E Eagan, Sushant M Ranadive

Abstract readLetter
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical autonomic research : official journal of the Clinical Autonomic Research Society, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Emily F BlakeDepartment of Kinesiology, College Park School of Public Health, University of Maryland, 4200, Valley Drive, College Park, MD, 20742, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1838-8245
Lauren E EaganDepartment of Kinesiology, College Park School of Public Health, University of Maryland, 4200, Valley Drive, College Park, MD, 20742, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4746-7540
Sushant M RanadiveDepartment of Kinesiology, College Park School of Public Health, University of Maryland, 4200, Valley Drive, College Park, MD, 20742, USA. ranadive@umd.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-1674-4285
University of Maryland, College Park · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe interplay between the sympathetic and parasympathetic branches of the autonomic nervous system contribute to adequate hemodynamic responses to stressors, reflected by the variation in intervals between heart beats, known as heart rate variability. The sex hormones estrogen and progesterone have been shown to affect autonomic function. The extent to which autonomic function may vary between different hormone phases of the natural menstrual cycle and how this relationship may differ in women taking oral contraceptives has yet to be fully elucidated. PURPOSE: To investigate differences in heart rate variability between the early follicular and early luteal phases of the menstrual cycle in naturally menstruating women and in oral contraceptive pill users.

methodsTwenty-two young (22 ± 3 years), healthy women who were naturally menstruating or taking oral contraceptive pills participated in this study. Heart rate variability was measured at rest and during two sympathomimetic stressors: isometric handgrip exercise and cold pressor test.

resultsThe proportion of successive NN intervals that differ by more than 50 ms was higher in oral contraceptive pill users during the placebo pill phase. Absolute high-frequency power was higher in the naturally menstruating women during the early luteal phase, relative to the early follicular phase. Other indices of vagal modulation were not different at rest or during sympathetic activation between hormone phases or groups.

conclusionsVagal modulation may be increased in the early luteal menstrual cycle phase. Further,oral contraceptive use does not appear to adversely affect this modulation in young, healthy women.

Indexed as

Hand StrengthMenstruationContraceptives, OralFemaleHeart RateHormonesHumansMenstrual CycleContraceptives, OralHormonesAutonomic functionEarly follicular phaseEarly luteal phaseSex hormonesSympathomimetic stressors

Identifiers

PMID37294472
OpenAlexW4379966285

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.