Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37294366›Full record

ArticleLa Radiologia medica2023

Stereotactic boost on residual disease after external-beam irradiation in clinical stage III non-small cell lung cancer: mature results of stereotactic body radiation therapy post radiation therapy (SBRTpostRT) study.

Silvana Parisi, Gianluca Ferini, Sara Lillo, Anna Brogna, Federico Chillari, Giacomo Ferrantelli, Nicola Settineri, Anna Santacaterina, Angelo Platania, Salvatore Leotta and 8 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in La Radiologia medica, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Definitive (chemo)radiotherapy of enteric-type adenocarcinoma of the lung: time to unmask an underrated treatment option?Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Design and Development of a Device (SifilottoCurrent oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Silvana Parisi *Radiation Oncology Unit, Department of Biomedical, Dental Science and Morphological and Functional Images, University of Messina, Messina, Italy.
Gianluca Ferini *REM Radioterapia Srl, Istituto Oncologico del Mediterraneo, Viagrande, Catania, Italy.
Sara LilloRadiation Oncology Unit, Department of Biomedical, Dental Science and Morphological and Functional Images, University of Messina, Messina, Italy. lillosara3@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7300-1168
Anna BrognaMedical Physics Unit, A.O.U. "G. Martino", Messina, Italy.
Federico ChillariRadiation Oncology Unit, Department of Biomedical, Dental Science and Morphological and Functional Images, University of Messina, Messina, Italy.
Giacomo FerrantelliRadiation Oncology Unit, Department of Biomedical, Dental Science and Morphological and Functional Images, University of Messina, Messina, Italy.
Nicola SettineriRadiation Oncology Unit, Papardo Hospital, Messina, Italy.
Anna SantacaterinaRadiation Oncology Unit, Papardo Hospital, Messina, Italy.
Angelo PlataniaRadiation Oncology Unit, Papardo Hospital, Messina, Italy.
Salvatore LeottaRadiation Oncology Unit, Papardo Hospital, Messina, Italy.
Giuseppe CasablancaThoracic Surgery Unit, Papardo Hospital, Messina, Italy.
Alessandro RussoMedical Oncology Unit, Papardo Hospital, Messina, Italy.
Antonio PontorieroRadiation Oncology Unit, Department of Biomedical, Dental Science and Morphological and Functional Images, University of Messina, Messina, Italy.
Vincenzo AdamoMedical Oncology Unit, Papardo Hospital, Messina, Italy.
Fabio MinutoliRadiation Oncology Unit, Department of Biomedical, Dental Science and Morphological and Functional Images, University of Messina, Messina, Italy.
Antonio BottariRadiation Oncology Unit, Department of Biomedical, Dental Science and Morphological and Functional Images, University of Messina, Messina, Italy.
Alberto Cacciola *Radiation Oncology Unit, Department of Biomedical, Dental Science and Morphological and Functional Images, University of Messina, Messina, Italy.
Stefano Pergolizzi *Radiation Oncology Unit, Department of Biomedical, Dental Science and Morphological and Functional Images, University of Messina, Messina, Italy.
University of Messina · ITAzienda Ospedaliera Ospedali Riuniti Papardo Piemonte · ITAzienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Policlinico "G. Martino" · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo evaluate the role of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) delivered after external-beam fractionated irradiation in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with clinical stage III A, B. MATERIALS AND

methodsAll patients received three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) or intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) (60-66 Gy/30-33 fractions of 2 Gy/5 days a week) with or without concomitant chemotherapy. Within 60 days from the end of irradiation, a SBRT boost (12-22 Gy in 1-3 fractions) was delivered on the residual disease.

resultsHere we report the mature results of 23 patients homogeneously treated and followed up for a median time of 5.35 years (range 4.16-10.16). The rate of overall clinical response after external beam and stereotactic boost was 100%. No treatment-related mortality was recorded. Radiation-related acute toxicities with a grade ≥ 2 were observed in 6/23 patients (26.1%): 4/23 (17.4%) had esophagitis with mild esophageal pain (G2); in 2/23 (8.7%) clinical radiation pneumonitis G2 was observed. Lung fibrosis (20/23 patients, 86.95%) represented a typical late tissue damage, which was symptomatic in one patient. Median disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were 27.8 (95% CI, 4.2-51.3) and 56.7 months (95% CI, 34.9-78.5), respectively. Median local progression-free survival (PFS) was 17 months (range 11.6-22.4), with a median distant PFS of 18 months (range 9.6-26.4). The 5-year actuarial DFS and OS rates were 28.7% and 35.2%, respectively.

conclusionsWe confirm that a stereotactic boost after radical irradiation is feasible in stage III NSCLC patients. All fit patients who have no indication to adjuvant immunotherapy and presenting residual disease after curative irradiation could benefit from stereotactic boost because outcomes seem to be better than might be historically assumed.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungLung NeoplasmsRadiation InjuriesRadiosurgeryRadiotherapy, ConformalRadiotherapy, Intensity-ModulatedEtoposideHumansEtoposideNon-small cell lung cancerResidual diseaseStereotactic body radiation therapyStereotactic boost

Identifiers

PMID37294366
OpenAlexW4379967042

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.