Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37294364›Full record

ArticleCurrent microbiology2023

Gut Microbiome Dysbiosis in Patients with Endometrial Cancer vs. Healthy Controls Based on 16S rRNA Gene Sequencing.

Yue Li, Geng Liu, Runqi Gong, Yong Xi

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current microbiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yue LiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Dalian Municipal Women and Children's Medical Center (Group), No.1, Dunhuang Road, Shahekou District, Dalian, Liaoning, 116033, P.R. China.
Geng LiuDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Dalian Municipal Women and Children's Medical Center (Group), No.1, Dunhuang Road, Shahekou District, Dalian, Liaoning, 116033, P.R. China.
Runqi GongDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Liaoning Provincial Hospital for women and children, Shenyang, Liaoning, 110004, P.R. China.
Yong XiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Dalian Municipal Women and Children's Medical Center (Group), No.1, Dunhuang Road, Shahekou District, Dalian, Liaoning, 116033, P.R. China. 18098858765@163.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4728-2802
Dalian Medical University · CNLiaoning Provincial People's Hospital · CN

Funding

Dalian Medical Science Research Program 2011021
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Metabolic diseases like obesity, diabetes, and hypertension are considered major risk factors associated with endometrial cancer. Considering that an imbalance in the gut microbiome may lead to metabolic alterations, we hypothesized that alteration in the gut microbioma might be an indirect factor in the development of endometrial cancer. Our aim was to profile the gut microbiota of patients with endometrial cancer compared with healthy controls in this study. Thus, we used 16S rRNA high-throughput gene sequencing on the Illumina NovaSeq platform to profile microbial communities. Fecal samples were collected from 33 endometrial cancer patients (EC group) and 32 healthy controls (N group) between February 2021 and July 2021. The total numbers of operational taxonomic units (OTUs) in the N and EC groups were 28,537 and 18,465, respectively, while the number of OTUs shared by the two groups was 4771. This study was the first to report that the alpha diversity of the gut microbiota was significantly reduced in endometrial cancer patients vs. healthy controls. Also, there was a significant difference in the distribution of microbiome between the two groups: the abundance of Firmicutes, Clostridia, Clostridiales, Ruminococcaceae, Faecalibacterium, and Gemmiger_formicis decreased, while that of Proteobacteria, Gammaproteobacteria, Enterobacteriales, Enterobacteriaceae and Shigella increased significantly in the EC group vs. healthy controls (all p < 0.05). The predominant intestinal microbiota of the endometrial cancer patients was Proteobacteria, Gammaproteobacteria, Enterobacteriales, Enterobacteriaceae, and Shigella. These results imply that adjusting the composition of the gut microbiota and maintaining microbiota homeostasis may be an effective strategy for preventing and treating endometrial cancer.

Indexed as

Endometrial NeoplasmsGastrointestinal MicrobiomeBacillotaDysbiosisEnterobacteriaceaeEubacterialesFecesFemaleGenes, rRNAHumansProteobacteriaRNA, Ribosomal, 16SRNA, Ribosomal, 16S

Identifiers

PMID37294364
PMCPMC10256650
OpenAlexW4379966307

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.