ArticleJACC. Clinical electrophysiology2023
Conduction Velocity Dispersion Predicts Postinfarct Ventricular Tachycardia Circuit Sites and Associates With Lipomatous Metaplasia.
Article in JACC. Clinical electrophysiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Hodgkin-Huxley-Katz Prize Lecture: Heart digital twins: A new paradigm in arrhythmia medicine.The Journal of physiology · 2026Article
- Prognostic significance and influencing factors of lipomatous metaplasia in patients after myocardial infarction.Insights into imaging · 2025Article
- Translational approach to ventricular innervation: the posterior descending ganglionated plexus.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2025Article
- Reply to: Stochastic virtual heart model predictions.Nature cardiovascular research · 2025Article
- Arrhythmogenic Ventricular Remodeling by Next-Generation Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Acalabrutinib.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Up digital and personal: How heart digital twins can transform heart patient care.Heart rhythm · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundRegional myocardial conduction velocity (CV) dispersion has not been studied in postinfarct patients with ventricular tachycardia (VT).
objectivesThis study sought to compare the following: 1) the association of CV dispersion vs repolarization dispersion with VT circuit sites; and 2) myocardial lipomatous metaplasia (LM) vs fibrosis as the anatomic substrate for CV dispersion.
methodsAmong 33 postinfarct patients with VT, we characterized dense and border zone infarct tissue by late gadolinium enhancement cardiac magnetic resonance, and LM by computed tomography, with both images registered with electroanatomic maps. Activation recovery interval (ARI) was the time interval from the minimum derivative within the QRS complex to the maximum derivative within the T-wave on unipolar electrograms. CV at each EAM point was the mean CV between that point and 5 adjacent points along the activation wave front. CV and ARI dispersion were the coefficient of variation (CoV) of CV and ARI per American Heart Association (AHA) segment, respectively.
resultsRegional CV dispersion exhibited a much larger range than ARI dispersion, with median 0.65 vs 0.24; P < 0.001. CV dispersion was a more robust predictor of the number of critical VT sites per AHA segment than ARI dispersion. Regional LM area was more strongly associated with CV dispersion than fibrosis area. LM area was larger (median 0.44 vs 0.20 cm
conclusionsRegional CV dispersion more strongly predicts VT circuit sites than repolarization dispersion, and LM is a critical substrate for CV dispersion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.