ArticleThe journal of vascular access2024
Did stopping ultrasound surveillance during COVID-19 result in an increase of the dialysis access thrombosis rate?
Article in The journal of vascular access, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe COVID-19 pandemic resulted in cessation and subsequent reduction of routine care including the outpatient ultrasound surveillance of AVF. This un-planned service disruption allowed evaluation of effectiveness of US surveillance in reducing AVF/AVG thrombosis.
methodsThis study was a secondary data analysis of monthly access patency for all in-centre patients receiving haemodialysis using an AVF or AVG over a 2-year period (April 2019-March 2021). The study included 298 patients with age, access type, patency and COVID status measured as variables. Thrombosis rates for the 12 months prior to COVID-19 and then during the first 12 months of the pandemic were also measured. Statistical analysis to assess mean and standard deviation for relevant variables was used. A
resultsAt the end of the study an increase in thrombosis rate (%) in the non-surveillance year was observed ((1.20) thrombosis/patient/year in the surveillance group vs (1.68) thrombosis/patient/year in the non-surveillance group). Monthly mean of thrombosed access during surveillance (
conclusionReduction in routine Ultrasound surveillance following the COVID-19 pandemic was associated with a significant increase in access thrombosis rate. Further research is needed to unpick whether the associations seen were directly due to service changes, associated with COVID-19 or other factors during the pandemic. This association was independent of SARS-CoV-2 infection status. Clinical teams should consider alternative service delivery options including out-reach, bedside surveillance to balance risks of access thrombosis versus reducing the risk of nosocomial infection with hospital visits.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.