ArticlePhysiological research2023
Age-Dependent Effects of Remote Preconditioning in Hypertensive Rat Hearts are Associated With Activation of RISK Signaling.
Article in Physiological research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Translational Barriers and Optimization Strategies for Remote Ischemic Conditioning to Enhance Stroke Cerebroprotection.Biomolecules · 2026Review
- Transfer of remote ischemic preconditioning plasma from heart transplant patients into isolated perfused rat hearts prior ischemia/reperfusion injury-a translational study of cardioprotection.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Article
- Impact of ischemic preconditioning combined with aerobic exercise on 24-h ambulatory blood pressure in men with prehypertension and stage 1 hypertension.Frontiers in physiology · 2024Article
- Is Intrinsic Cardioprotection a Laboratory Phenomenon or a Clinically Relevant Tool to Salvage the Failing Heart?International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) represents one of the forms of innate cardioprotection. While being effective in animal models, its application in humans has not been always beneficial, which might be attributed to the presence of various comorbidities, such as hypertension, or being related to the confounding factors, such as patients' sex and age. RIPC has been shown to mediate its cardioprotective effects through the activation of Reperfusion Injury Salvage Kinase (RISK) pathway in healthy animals, however, scarce evidence supports this effect of RIPC in the hearts of spontaneously hypertensive (SHR) rats, in particular, in relationship with aging. The study aimed to investigate the effectiveness of RIPC in male SHR rats of different age and to evaluate the role of RISK pathway in the effect of RIPC on cardiac ischemic tolerance. RIPC was performed using three cycles of inflation/deflation of the pressure cuff placed on the hind limb of anesthetized rats aged three, five and eight months. Subsequently, hearts were excised, Langendorff-perfused and exposed to 30-min global ischemia and 2-h reperfusion. Infarct-sparing and antiarrhythmic effects of RIPC were observed only in three and five months-old animals but not in eight months-old rats. Beneficial effects of RIPC were associated with increased activity of RISK and decreased apoptotic signaling only in three and five months-old animals. In conclusion, RIPC showed cardioprotective effects in SHR rats that were partially age-dependent and might be attributed to the differences in the activation of RISK pathway and various aspects of ischemia/reperfusion injury in aging animals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.