Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37293841›Full record

SynthesisMultiple sclerosis (Houndmills, Basingstoke, England)2023

ECTRIMS/EAN consensus on vaccination in people with multiple sclerosis: Improving immunization strategies in the era of highly active immunotherapeutic drugs.

Susana Otero-Romero, Christine Lebrun-Frénay, Saúl Reyes, Maria Pia Amato, Magda Campins, Mauricio Farez, Massimo Filippi, Yael Hacohen, Bernhard Hemmer, Rosa Juuti and 5 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readSystematic ReviewConsensus Statement
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Multiple sclerosis (Houndmills, Basingstoke, England), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
9.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 13 institutions in 9 countries.

Susana Otero-RomeroDepartment of Preventive Medicine and Epidemiology, Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital, Barcelona, Spain Multiple Sclerosis Centre of Catalonia (Cemcat), Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital, Barcelona, Spain.
Christine Lebrun-FrénayCRC-SEP Nice, CHU de Nice, Universite Nice Cote d'Azur UR2CA-URRIS, Nice, France.ORCID 0000-0002-3713-2416
Saúl ReyesFundación Santa Fe de Bogotá, Bogotá, Colombia School of Medicine, Universidad de los Andes, Bogotá, Colombia Blizard Institute, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
Maria Pia AmatoDepartment NEUROFARBA, University of Florence, Florence, Italy IRCCS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi, Florence, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3325-3760
Magda CampinsDepartment of Preventive Medicine and Epidemiology, Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital, Barcelona, Spain.
Mauricio FarezCentro para la Investigación de Enfermedades Neuroinmunológicas (CIEN), FLENI, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Massimo FilippiNeuroimaging Research Unit, Division of Neuroscience, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy Neurology Unit, Neurorehabilitation Unit, and Neurophysiology Service, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5485-0479
Yael HacohenDepartment of Paediatric Neurology, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, London, UK Department of Neuroinflammation, Queen Square Multiple Sclerosis Centre, UCL Institute of Neurology, London, UK.
Bernhard HemmerDepartment of Neurology, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany Munich Cluster for Systems Neurology (SyNergy), Munich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-5985-6784
Rosa JuutiMultiple Sclerosis International Federation, London, UK.
Melinda MagyariDepartment of Neurology, Danish Multiple Sclerosis Center and the Danish Multiple Sclerosis Registry, Rigshospitalet and University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-0972-5222
Celia Oreja-GuevaraDepartment of Neurology, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, IdISSC, Departamento de Medicina, Universidad Complutense, Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-9221-5716
Aksel SivaDepartment of Neurology, School of Medicine, Istanbul University Cerrahpasa, Cerrahpasa, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-8340-6641
Sandra VukusicService de Neurologie, Sclérose en Plaques, Pathologies de la Myéline et Neuro-inflammation, Centre de Référence des Maladies Inflammatoires Rares du Cerveau et de la Moelle, Hôpital Neurologique Pierre Wertheimer, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France.ORCID 0000-0001-7337-7122
Mar TintoréMultiple Sclerosis Centre of Catalonia (Cemcat), Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-9999-5359
Vall d'Hebron Hospital Universitari · ESCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice · FRDon Carlo Gnocchi Foundation · ITFundación para la Lucha contra las Enfermedades Neurológicas de la Infancia · ARGreat Ormond Street Hospital · GBHospital Clínico San Carlos · ESIstanbul University-Cerrahpaşa · TRMultiple Sclerosis International Federation · GBMunich Cluster for Systems Neurology · DEUniversidad de Los Andes · COUniversité Claude Bernard Lyon 1 · FRUniversity of Copenhagen · DKVita-Salute San Raffaele University · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWith the new highly active drugs available for people with multiple sclerosis (pwMS), vaccination becomes an essential part of the risk management strategy.

objectiveTo develop a European evidence-based consensus for the vaccination strategy of pwMS who are candidates for disease-modifying therapies (DMTs).

methodsThis work was conducted by a multidisciplinary working group using formal consensus methodology. Clinical questions (defined as population, interventions, and outcomes) considered all authorized DMTs and vaccines. A systematic literature search was conducted and quality of evidence was defined according to the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine Levels of Evidence. The recommendations were formulated based on the quality of evidence and the risk-benefit balance.

resultsSeven questions, encompassing vaccine safety, vaccine effectiveness, global vaccination strategy and vaccination in sub-populations (pediatric, pregnant women, elderly and international travelers) were considered. A narrative description of the evidence considering published studies, guidelines, and position statements is presented. A total of 53 recommendations were agreed by the working group after three rounds of consensus.

conclusionThis first European consensus on vaccination in pwMS proposes the best vaccination strategy according to current evidence and expert knowledge, with the goal of homogenizing the immunization practices in pwMS.

Indexed as

Multiple SclerosisAgedChildEvidence-Based MedicineFemaleHumansImmunizationPregnancyVaccinationconsensusdisease-modifying therapyinfectionsMultiple sclerosisvaccination

Identifiers

PMID37293841
PMCPMC10338708
OpenAlexW4379967219

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.