SynthesisInternational wound journal2023
Surgical site wound infection and wound pain after video-assisted thoracoscopy in patients with lung cancer: A meta-analysis.
Synthesis in International wound journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effects of accelerated rehabilitation surgical care on the surgical site wound infection and postoperative complications in patients of lung cancer: A meta-analysis.International wound journal · 2024Pooled it
- Surgical site wound infection and wound pain after video-assisted thoracoscopy in patients with lung cancer: A meta-analysis.International wound journal · 2023Pooled it
- CYP2D6 gene polymorphisms influence postoperative pain sensitivity and drug response in lung cancer surgery.International journal of clinical and experimental pathology · 2026Article
- RETRACTION: Surgical Site Wound Infection and Wound Pain after Video-Assisted Thoracoscopy in Patients With Lung Cancer: A Meta-Analysis.International wound journal · 2025Article
- Comprehensive assessment of risk factors and pathogenic characteristics of wound infections following thoracoscopic radical resection for lung cancer.International wound journal · 2024Article
- RETRACTED: Effects of thoracoscopic lobectomy on surgical wound infection in patients with lung cancer: A meta-analysis.International wound journal · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Retraction · 2025-03-06Compromised Peer Review · Investigation by Journal/Publisher ·
- Retracted
Authors and funding
4 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A meta-analysis was performed to comprehensively assess the effects of video-assisted thoracoscopy on surgical site wound infection and wound pain in patients with lung cancer. Studies on video-assisted thoracoscopy for lung cancer were collected from PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Chinese Biomedical Literature Database, and Wanfang database, from inception to January 2023. Two researchers independently screened the literature, extracted the data, and evaluated the quality of the included studies according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.4 software. Thirty-one articles with a total of 3608 patients were included, with 1809 in the video-assisted thoracoscopy group and 1799 in the control group. Compared with the control group, video-assisted thoracoscopy significantly reduced surgical site wound infection (odds ratio: 0.22, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.14-0.33, P < .001) and surgical site wound pain at postoperative day 1 (standardised mean difference [SMD]: -0.90, 95% CI: -1.17 to -0.64, P < .001) and postoperative day 3 (SMD: -1.59, 95% CI: -2.25 to -0.92, P < .001). Thus, these results showed that video-assisted thoracoscopy may have beneficial outcomes by reducing surgical site wound infection and pain. However, owing to the large variation in sample sizes and some methodological shortcomings, further validation is needed in future studies with higher quality and larger sample sizes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.