Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37293610›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2023

Socio-demographic determinants of the knowledge and attitude of Nepalese healthcare workers toward human monkeypox: a cross-sectional study.

Santa Kumar Das, Abhinav Bhattarai, Simran Kc, Sangam Shah, Kiran Paudel, Sakchhyam Timsina, Sunraj Tharu, Laba Rawal, Dawin A Leon-Figueroa, Alfonso J Rodriguez-Morales and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Emergency department approach to monkeypox.World journal of emergency medicine · 2023
    Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Santa Kumar DasTribhuvan University Teaching Hospital, Institute of Medicine, Tribhuvan University, Tribhuvan, Nepal.
Abhinav BhattaraiTribhuvan University Teaching Hospital, Institute of Medicine, Tribhuvan University, Tribhuvan, Nepal.
Simran KcCentral Department of Public Health, Institute of Medicine, Tribhuvan University, Tribhuvan, Nepal.
Sangam ShahTribhuvan University Teaching Hospital, Institute of Medicine, Tribhuvan University, Tribhuvan, Nepal.
Kiran PaudelTribhuvan University Teaching Hospital, Institute of Medicine, Tribhuvan University, Tribhuvan, Nepal.
Sakchhyam TimsinaTribhuvan University Teaching Hospital, Institute of Medicine, Tribhuvan University, Tribhuvan, Nepal.
Sunraj TharuTribhuvan University Teaching Hospital, Institute of Medicine, Tribhuvan University, Tribhuvan, Nepal.
Laba RawalTribhuvan University Teaching Hospital, Institute of Medicine, Tribhuvan University, Tribhuvan, Nepal.
Dawin A Leon-FigueroaNepal Health Frontiers, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Alfonso J Rodriguez-MoralesFacultad de Medicina Humana, Universidad San Martín de Porres, Chiclayo, Peru.
Joshuan J BarbozaSchool of Medicine, Universidad Cesar Vallejo, Trujillo, Peru.
Ranjit SahTribhuvan University Teaching Hospital, Institute of Medicine, Tribhuvan University, Tribhuvan, Nepal.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human monkeypox is an infectious zoonotic disease and since May 2022, there has been a spike in cases worldwide. In this regard, a global health emergency has been declared by the World Health Organization (WHO) on July 23rd, 2022. Although there have been no confirmed human monkeypox cases in Nepal yet, the nation is undeniably at risk of an outbreak. Despite all preventive efforts and preparedness for monkeypox, there still remain several challenges including the literacy and knowledge of our healthcare workers regarding monkeypox. The aim of this study was to assess the level of knowledge and attitude of Nepalese healthcare workers regarding monkeypox. A cross-sectional study was performed on different healthcare workers at Tribhuvan University Teaching Hospital on the month of October 2022 using a set of validated questionnaires used previously in a Saudi Arabian study. An in-person survey was conducted where a total of 220 questionnaires were distributed. The response rate was 93%. Knowledge was categorized into high or low based on the mean knowledge score. The attitude was assessed using a 3-point Likert scale. The association of the knowledge and attitude of the respondents in accordance with their socio-demographics was statistically evaluated using Pearson's Chi-square test. The mean knowledge score was 13. A larger proportion of the respondents (60.4%) demonstrated a high knowledge and 51.1% demonstrated a positive attitude. Studying monkeypox during medical education possessed a significant difference in the attitude (

Indexed as

Mpox, MonkeypoxCross-Sectional StudiesDemographyHealth PersonnelHumansNepalSaudi Arabiaattitudedeterminantshealthcare workershuman monkeypoxknowledge

Identifiers

PMID37293610
PMCPMC10244767

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.