ArticlePharmacogenomics and personalized medicine2023
Leucyl and Cystinyl Aminopeptidase as a Prognostic-Related Biomarker in OV Correlating with Immune Infiltrates.
Article in Pharmacogenomics and personalized medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: It was indicated that tumor intrinsic heterogeneity and the tumor microenvironment (TME) of ovarian cancer (OV) influence immunotherapy efficacy and patient outcomes. Leucyl and cystinyl aminopeptidase (LNPEP) encodes a zinc-dependent aminopeptidase, which has been proved to participant in the vesicle-mediated transport and class I MHC mediated antigen processing and presentation. However, the function of LNPEP in TME of OV and its potential molecular mechanisms have not been determined. Therefore, we aimed to investigate a prognostic biomarker which may be helpful in identifying TME heterogeneity of ovarian cancer. Methods: In this study, bioinformatics databases were used to explore the expression profile and immune infiltration of LNPEP. Bioinformatics analyses of survival data and interactors of LNPEP were conducted to predict the prognostic value of LNPEP in OV. The protein levels of LNPEP were validated by Western blot and immunohistochemistry. Results: Based on the TCGA data, our data displayed that the mRNA expression of LNPEP was markedly down-regulated in ovarian cancer than that in para-cancer tissues, contrary to the protein level. Importantly, high LNPEP expression was associated with poor prognosis in patients with OV. Furthermore, Cox regression analysis showed that LNPEP was an independent prognostic factor in OV. GO and KEGG pathway analyses indicated the co-expressed genes of LNPEP were mainly related to a variety of immune-related pathways, including Th1 and Th2 cell differentiation, Th17 cell differentiation, and immunoregulatory interaction. Our data also demonstrated that the expression of LNPEP was strongly correlated with immune infiltration levels, immunomodulators, chemokines and chemokine receptors. Conclusion: In our study, we identified and established a prognostic signature of immune-related LNPEP in OV, which will be of great value in predicting the prognosis of clinical trials and may become a new therapeutic target for immunological research and potential prognostic biomarker in OV.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.