Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37293588›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2023

Current chemoprevention approaches in Lynch syndrome and Familial adenomatous polyposis: a global clinical practice survey.

Kathryn A Mraz, Rachel Hodan, Linda Rodgers-Fouche, Sanjeevani Arora, Francesc Balaguer, Jose G Guillem, Joanne M Jeter, Priyanka Kanth, Dan Li, David Liska and 7 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 16 institutions in 3 countries.

Kathryn A MrazDepartment of Genetics, Grey Genetics, Brooklyn, NY, United States.
Rachel HodanCancer Genetics, Stanford Health Care, Palo Alto, CA, United States.
Linda Rodgers-FoucheCenter for Cancer Risk Assessment, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States.
Sanjeevani AroraCancer Prevention and Control Program, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, United States.
Francesc BalaguerDepartment of Gastroenterology, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBEREHD), University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Jose G GuillemDivision of Gastrointestinal Surgery, University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States.
Joanne M JeterDepartment of Internal Medicine, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States.
Priyanka KanthDepartment of Gastroenterology, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, United States.
Dan LiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Kaiser Permanente Medical Center, Santa Clara, CA, United States.
David LiskaDepartment of Colorectal Surgery and Sanford R. Weiss MD Center for Hereditary Colorectal Neoplasia, Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, United States.
Joshua MelsonDivision of Gastroenterology, University of Arizona Cancer Center, Tucson, AZ, United States.
Kimberly PerezDepartment of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute/Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States.
Charite RickerDivision of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States.
Brian H ShirtsDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States.
Eduardo VilarDepartment of Clinical Cancer Prevention, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States.
Bryson W KatonaDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, United States.
Mev Dominguez-ValentinDepartment of Tumor Biology, Institute of Cancer Research, The Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Cancer Genetics (United States) · USCenter for Cancer Research · USCleveland Clinic · USFox Chase Cancer Center · USHarvard University · USHuntsman Cancer Institute · USKaiser Permanente Santa Clara Medical Center · USMedStar Georgetown University Hospital · USNorwegian Cancer Society · NOThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USUniversitat de Barcelona · ESUniversity of Arizona · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · USUniversity of Southern California · USUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: International chemoprevention preferences and approaches in Lynch syndrome (LS) and Aim: To describe current chemoprevention strategies for patients with LS or FAP/AFAP (referred to collectively as FAP) practiced by members of four international hereditary cancer societies through administration of a survey. Results: Ninety-six participants across four hereditary gastrointestinal cancer societies responded to the survey. Most respondents (91%, 87/96) completed information regarding their demographics and practice characteristics relating to hereditary gastrointestinal cancer and chemoprevention clinical practices. Sixty-nine percent (60/87) of respondents offer chemoprevention for FAP and/or LS as a part of their practice. Of the 75% (72/96) of survey respondents who were eligible to answer practice-based clinical vignettes based off of their responses to ten barrier questions regarding chemoprevention, 88% (63/72) of those participants completed at least one case vignette question to further characterize chemoprevention practices in FAP and/or LS. In FAP, 51% (32/63) would offer chemoprevention for rectal polyposis, with sulindac - 300 mg (18%, 10/56) and aspirin (16%, 9/56) being the most frequently selected options. In LS, 93% (55/59) of professionals discuss chemoprevention and 59% (35/59) frequently recommend chemoprevention. Close to half of the respondents (47%, 26/55) would recommend beginning aspirin at time of commencement of the patient's first screening colonoscopy (usually at age 25yrs). Ninety-four percent (47/50) of respondents would consider a patient's diagnosis of LS as an influential factor for aspirin use. There was no consensus on the dose of aspirin (≤100 mg, >100 mg - 325 mg or 600 mg) to offer patients with LS and there was no agreement on how other factors, such as BMI, hypertension, family history of colorectal cancer, and family history of heart disease, would affect the recommendation for aspirin use. Possible harm among older patients (>70 years) was identified as the most common reason to discourage aspirin use. Conclusion: Although chemoprevention is widely discussed and offered to patients with FAP and LS by an international group of hereditary gastrointestinal cancer experts, there is significant heterogeneity in how it is applied in clinical practice.

Indexed as

aspirinbarrierschemopreventionCRCFamilial adenomatous polyposisFAPLynch syndrome

Identifiers

PMID37293588
PMCPMC10247284
OpenAlexW4377966236

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.