Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37293459›Full record

ArticleJournal of preventive medicine and hygiene2023

Critical pathways for continuous quality improvement: a multicentric analysis on the management of patients with lung cancer in Italian best performing hospitals.

Antonio Giulio DE Belvis, Maria Chiara Catalani, Alisha Morsella, Giorgio Sessa, Amelia Palinuro, Gabriele Giubbini, Florence Watteble, Carmen Angioletti

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of preventive medicine and hygiene, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Antonio Giulio DE BelvisCritical Pathways and Outcomes Evaluation Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Maria Chiara CatalaniCritical Pathways and Outcomes Evaluation Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Alisha MorsellaCritical Pathways and Outcomes Evaluation Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Giorgio SessaCritical Pathways and Outcomes Evaluation Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Amelia PalinuroCritical Pathways and Outcomes Evaluation Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Gabriele GiubbiniCritical Pathways and Outcomes Evaluation Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Florence WattebleCritical Pathways and Outcomes Evaluation Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Carmen AngiolettiCritical Pathways and Outcomes Evaluation Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Critical pathways (CPs) are effective change management tools used to improve quality in healthcare nationally implemented in Italy in 2015. This study aims to map the country's state-of-the-art regarding the adoption of CPs and to verify the existence of factors that determine the success of their implementation and the relative entity of their impact, by analysing the management of Lung Cancer (LC) as a case-study. Methods: Our methodology followed the SQUIRE guidelines for quality improvement reporting (2015). Starting from the 2017 ranking table published by the National Outcome Program, we selected and included in our sample all Italian hospitals who, according to Ministerial Decree n. 70/2015, met national quality threshold for LC treatment. To investigate regional-level and hospital-level factors believed to be responsible for the successful implementation of a CP, a Google Modules questionnaire was constructed and sent to the selected facilities; subsequently, a web-based research was carried out for missing data. Associations between variables were tested in STATA by means of correlation tests and a linear regression model. Results: 41 hospitals matched our inclusion criteria. Of these, 68% defined an internal Lung Cancer Critical Pathway (LCCP). Our results confirmed the presence of critical success factors that favour the correct implementation of a LCCP. Conclusions: Notwithstanding the availability of CPs, their adoption in routine clinical practice still lacks consistency, suggesting the necessity to resort to digital solutions, to increment the level of regional commitment and workforce commitment and to reinforce quality standards monitoring.

Indexed as

Critical PathwaysLung NeoplasmsHospitalsHumansItalyQuality ImprovementCritical pathwayLung Cancer managementQuality improvement

Identifiers

PMID37293459
PMCPMC10246618

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.