Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37293426›Full record

SynthesisJournal of sports science & medicine2023

The Health and Functional Benefits of Eccentric versus Concentric Exercise Training: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Misha Ansari, Sibella Hardcastle, Stephen Myers, Andrew D Williams

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · bronzeAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of sports science & medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 13 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
8.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06574854 nacompletednot on this map

Effects of Descending Stair Walking on Cardiometabolic Adaptations Among Obese, Untrained Women

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversiti Sains MalaysiaRan2023 to 2025Enrolled24ConditionsObesityArmsDSW, ASW
NCT07109102 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Exploring Long-Term Benefits of Eccentric Cycling Exercise on Physiological Responses, Exercise Capacity, and Quality of Life in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversiti Sains MalaysiaRan2025 to 2026Enrolled30ConditionsType 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM)ArmsModerate-intensity eccentric cycling, High-intensity eccentric cycling, Moderate-intensity concentric cycling
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Misha AnsariSchool of Health Sciences, University of Tasmania, Launceston, Australia.
Sibella HardcastleSchool of Health Sciences, University of Tasmania, Launceston, Australia.
Stephen MyersSchool of Health Sciences, University of Tasmania, Launceston, Australia.
Andrew D WilliamsSchool of Health Sciences, University of Tasmania, Launceston, Australia.
University of Tasmania · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This review compared the effects of eccentric versus concentric exercise training in healthy people and people with metabolic disease. A systematic search on Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, SPORTDiscus, Web of Science, SCOPUS and PubMed was conducted in February 2022. Randomised controlled trials conducted on sedentary healthy adults or those with an existing metabolic disease that compared eccentric versus concentric exercise training interventions of four weeks or longer that involved multiple joints and large muscle groups (e.g., walking, whole-body resistance training) were included in the review. The primary outcome was glucose handling, measured as HbA1c, HOMA, fasting glucose or insulin. Measures of cardiovascular health, muscle strength, and functional physical fitness were secondary outcomes. Nineteen trials involving 618 people were included. Results of meta-analyses showed that eccentric exercise had no benefit to glucose handling (HbA1c level; SMD - 0.99; 95% CI, -2.96 to 0.98; n = 74; P = 0.32) but resulted in significant increases in overall muscle strength (SMD 0.70; 95% CI 0.25 to 1.15; n = 224; P = 0.003) and decreases in blood pressure (Systolic Blood Pressure; MD -6.84; 95% CI, -9.84 to -3.84; n = 47, P = 0.00001, and Diastolic Blood Pressure; MD -6.39; 95% CI -9.62 to -3.15; n = 47, P = 0.0001). Eccentric exercise is effective for improving strength and some markers of cardiovascular health compared to traditional exercise modalities. Additional high-quality studies are necessary to validate these results. (PROSPERO registration: CRD42021232167).

Indexed as

ExerciseResistance TrainingAdultExercise TherapyGlycated HemoglobinHumansPhysical FitnessGlycated Hemoglobinmarkers of healthNon-traditional exercise modalitiesphysical fitness

Identifiers

PMID37293426
PMCPMC10244982
OpenAlexW4377986657

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.