ArticleArthroplasty today2023
Projections and Epidemiology of Revision Hip and Knee Arthroplasty in the United States to 2040-2060.
Article in Arthroplasty today, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 69 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
69 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Economic evaluation of robotic-assisted versus manual total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review of cost and clinical outcomes.EFORT open reviews · 2026Pooled it
- Total femur replacement in revision arthroplasty for non-oncologic patients: a systematic review.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2025Pooled it
- The Kerboull cross-plate: from the birth of a concept to the current indications.International orthopaedics · 2026Review
- Contemporary Survivorship of Highly Porous Hemispherical Shells in Aseptic Acetabular Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty.Arthroplasty today · 2026Article
- Is Fretting Corrosion at the Modular Junction of Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty Actually a Problem?The Journal of arthroplasty · 2026Article
- Periprosthetic joint infection as the leading indication associated with in-hospital death after revision hip and knee arthroplasty: a ten-year single-centre retrospective cohort study of 103 in-hospital deaths among 2495 patients.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2026Article
- Mix and match strategies in revision total hip arthroplasty: a review of techniques and outcomes.Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2026Review
- How long should we keep clinical isolates involved in bone and joint infections in microbiology laboratories?European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2026Review
- Midterm Outcomes of Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty With Cementation of a Monoblock Dual-Mobility Bearing Cup in a Porous Revision Acetabular Shell.Arthroplasty today · 2026Article
- Perioperative Dexamethasone Is Associated With a Reduced Risk of Periprosthetic Joint Infection Following Aseptic Revision Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty.Arthroplasty today · 2026Article
- Preoperative lower radiographic osteoarthritis severity in primary total knee arthroplasty increases revision risk by tenfold compared to severe osteoarthritis.Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2026Article
- Article
- Radiographic assessment of femoral, acetabular and global offset following hip spacer implantation in staged total hip arthroplasty".Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2026Article
- Total femoral replacement for severe femoral bone loss in non-oncologic patients: high complication rates but acceptable functional outcomes.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2026Observational
- Does the order matter? Comparing the order of stem placement and fracture reduction in revision total hip arthroplasty for Vancouver B2 and B3 periprosthetic femur fractures.Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2026Article
- The Economic Impact and Clinical Benefits of Intraosseous Injections in Total Knee Arthroplasty.Arthroplasty today · 2026Article
- Machine Learning for Revision Joint Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review of Distinct Challenges, Current Performance, and Clinical Readiness.Arthroplasty today · 2026Article
- Mid-Term Outcomes of a Next-Generation Modular Acetabular System in Primary and Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Adverse Effects Associated With Spinal Versus General Anaesthesia for Hip and Knee Arthroplasties: Protocol for a Systematic Review.Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica · 2026Review
- Robotic-assisted and AI-augmented arthroplasty: converging technologies in joint replacement.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Review
9 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: National projections of future joint arthroplasties are useful in understanding the changing burden of surgery and related outcomes on the health system. The aim of this study is to update the literature by producing Medicare projections for revision total joint arthroplasty procedures from 2040 through 2060. Methods: The study uses 2000-2019 data from the CMS Medicare Part-B National Summary and combines procedure counts using CPT codes for revision total joint arthroplasty procedures. In 2019, revision total knee arthroplasty (rTKA) and revision total hip arthroplasty (rTHA) procedures totaled 53,217 and 30,541, respectively, forming a baseline from which we generated point forecasts between 2020 and 2060 and 95% forecast intervals (FI). Results: On average, the model projects an annual growth rate of 1.77% for rTHAs and 4.67% for rTKAs. By 2040, rTHAs were projected to be 43,514 (95% FI = 37,429-50,589) and rTKAs were projected to be 115,147 (95% FI = 105,640-125,510). By 2060, rTHAs was projected to be 61,764 (95% FI = 49,927-76,408) and rTKAs were projected to be 286,740 (95% FI = 253,882-323,852). Conclusions: Based on 2019 total volume counts, the log-linear exponential model forecasts an increase in rTHA procedures of 42% by 2040 and 101% by 2060. Similarly, the estimated increase for rTKA is projected to be 149% by 2040 and 520% by 2060. An accurate projection of future revision procedure demands is important to understand future healthcare utilization and surgeon demand. This finding is only applicable to the Medicare population and demands further analysis for other population groups.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.