Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37293353›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in computational neuroscience2023

Learning cortical hierarchies with temporal Hebbian updates.

Pau Vilimelis Aceituno, Matilde Tristany Farinha, Reinhard Loidl, Benjamin F Grewe

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in computational neuroscience, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. The neuron as a direct data-driven controller.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Pau Vilimelis Aceituno *Institute of Neuroinformatics, University of Zurich and ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Matilde Tristany Farinha *Institute of Neuroinformatics, University of Zurich and ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Reinhard LoidlInstitute of Neuroinformatics, University of Zurich and ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Benjamin F Grewe *Institute of Neuroinformatics, University of Zurich and ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
ETH Zurich · CHUniversity of Zurich · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A key driver of mammalian intelligence is the ability to represent incoming sensory information across multiple abstraction levels. For example, in the visual ventral stream, incoming signals are first represented as low-level edge filters and then transformed into high-level object representations. Similar hierarchical structures routinely emerge in artificial neural networks (ANNs) trained for object recognition tasks, suggesting that similar structures may underlie biological neural networks. However, the classical ANN training algorithm, backpropagation, is considered biologically implausible, and thus alternative biologically plausible training methods have been developed such as Equilibrium Propagation, Deep Feedback Control, Supervised Predictive Coding, and Dendritic Error Backpropagation. Several of those models propose that local errors are calculated for each neuron by comparing apical and somatic activities. Notwithstanding, from a neuroscience perspective, it is not clear how a neuron could compare compartmental signals. Here, we propose a solution to this problem in that we let the apical feedback signal change the postsynaptic firing rate and combine this with a differential Hebbian update, a rate-based version of classical spiking time-dependent plasticity (STDP). We prove that weight updates of this form minimize two alternative loss functions that we prove to be equivalent to the error-based losses used in machine learning: the inference latency and the amount of top-down feedback necessary. Moreover, we show that the use of differential Hebbian updates works similarly well in other feedback-based deep learning frameworks such as Predictive Coding or Equilibrium Propagation. Finally, our work removes a key requirement of biologically plausible models for deep learning and proposes a learning mechanism that would explain how temporal Hebbian learning rules can implement supervised hierarchical learning.

Indexed as

backpropagationcortical hierarchiescredit assignmentdeep learningdifferential Hebbian learningspiking time-dependent plasticitysynaptic plasticitytarget propagation

Identifiers

PMID37293353
PMCPMC10244748
OpenAlexW4378072363

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.