ArticleGynecologic oncology reports2023
In-silico analysis of TCGA data showing multiple POLE-like favourable subgroups overlapping with TP53 mutated endometrial cancer: Implications for clinical practice in low and middle-income countries.
Article in Gynecologic oncology reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- The DNA Damage Response (DDR) landscape of endometrial cancer defines discrete disease subtypes and reveals therapeutic opportunities.NAR cancer · 2024Article
- Evaluating the Prognostic Factors and Survival Rates of Endometrial Cancer Patients in a Tertiary Referral Hospital in Northeast Thailand.Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The Cancer Genome Atlas cohort of endometrial carcinoma (TCGA-UCEC) includes almost 40% TP53-mutants encompassing missense and truncated variants. TCGA revealed 'POLE', characterized by POLE gene bearing exonuclease domain mutation (EDM), as the prognostically best molecular profile. The worst profile was characterized by TP53-mutated Type 2 cancer requiring adjuvant therapy having cost implications in low-resource settings. We aimed to find more 'POLE-like' favourable subgroups by searching TCGA cohort, especially within TP53 mutated risk group, that could eventually avoid adjuvant treatment in resource-poor settings. Method: Our study was an in-silico survival analysis performed on the TCGA-UCEC dataset using SPSS statistical package. TP53 and POLE mutations, microsatellite instability (MSI), time-to-event and clinicopathological parameters were compared among 512 endometrial cancer cases. Deleterious POLE-mutations were identified by Polyphen2. Progression free survival was studied using Kaplan-Meier plots keeping original 'POLE' as comparator. Result: In presence of wild type (WT)-TP53, other deleterious POLE-mutations behaved like POLE-EDM. Only truncated and not missense TP53 benefitted from POLE/MSI overlap. However, TP53 missense mutation, Y220C, was found to be as favourable as 'POLE'. Overlapping POLE, MSI and WT-TP53 also performed favourably. Truncated TP53 overlapped with POLE and/or MSI, TP53 Y220C alone and, WT-TP53 overlapped with POLE and MSI both, were named 'POLE-like' for prognostically behaving like the comparator 'POLE'. Conclusion: Obesity being a lesser frequent event in low and middle-income countries (LMICs), relative proportion of women with lower BMI and Type 2 endometrial cancers may be high. Identification of 'POLE-like' groups may facilitate therapeutic de-escalation in some TP53-mutated cases - a novel option. Instead of 5% (POLE-EDM), potential beneficiary would then comprise 10% (POLE-like) of TCGA-UCEC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.