ArticleRadiology. Artificial intelligence2023
Impact of Different Artificial Intelligence User Interfaces on Lung Nodule and Mass Detection on Chest Radiographs.
Article in Radiology. Artificial intelligence, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- A Systematic Review: The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Lung Cancer Screening in Detecting Lung Nodules on Chest X-Rays.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Diagnostic accuracy of artificial intelligence-assisted radiology assessment of cancer: a systematic review.BJR artificial intelligence · 2025Article
- Artificial intelligence uncertainty quantification in radiotherapy applications - A scoping review.Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology · 2024Article
- Artificial Intelligence Uncertainty Quantification in Radiotherapy Applications - A Scoping Review.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2024Article
- Developing, purchasing, implementing and monitoring AI tools in radiology: practical considerations. A multi-society statement from the ACR, CAR, ESR, RANZCR & RSNA.Insights into imaging · 2024Article
- Developing, Purchasing, Implementing and Monitoring AI Tools in Radiology: Practical Considerations. A Multi-Society Statement from the ACR, CAR, ESR, RANZCR and RSNA.Radiology. Artificial intelligence · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To explore the impact of different user interfaces (UIs) for artificial intelligence (AI) outputs on radiologist performance and user preference in detecting lung nodules and masses on chest radiographs. Materials and Methods: A retrospective paired-reader study with a 4-week washout period was used to evaluate three different AI UIs compared with no AI output. Ten radiologists (eight radiology attending physicians and two trainees) evaluated 140 chest radiographs (81 with histologically confirmed nodules and 59 confirmed as normal with CT), with either no AI or one of three UI outputs: Results: The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve improved when radiologists used the text-only output compared with no AI (0.87 vs 0.82; Conclusion: Text-only UI output significantly improved radiologist performance compared with no AI in the detection of lung nodules and masses on chest radiographs, but user preference did not correspond with user performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.