Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37293308›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2023

Combination of violet light irradiation and collagenase treatments in a rabbit model of keratoconus.

Hidenaga Kobashi, Takashi Yano, Kazuo Tsubota

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hidenaga KobashiDepartment of Ophthalmology, School of Medicine, Keio University, Tokyo, Japan.
Takashi YanoLife Science Laboratories, Ltd., Osaka, Japan.
Kazuo TsubotaDepartment of Ophthalmology, School of Medicine, Keio University, Tokyo, Japan.
Keio University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: We evaluated the use of collagenase treatment to generate a rabbit model of keratoconus and the impact of violet light (VL) irradiation on the disease model in six Japanese White rabbits. Methods: After epithelial debridement, the collagenase group was treated with a collagenase type II solution for 30 min; the control group was treated with a solution without collagenase. Three rabbits also underwent VL irradiation (375 nm, irradiance 310 μW/cm Results: A significant increase in Ks and corneal astigmatism was observed in the collagenase and VL irradiation groups compared with the control group on day 7. No significant difference was found in the change in corneal thickness between the groups. The elastic modulus at 3, 5, and 10% strain was significantly lower in the collagenase group than in the control group. There was no significant difference in the elastic modulus at any level of strain between the collagenase and VL irradiation groups. The average axial length at day 7 was significantly longer in the collagenase and VL irradiation groups than in the control group. Collagenase treatment induced a model of keratoconus by steepening the keratometric and astigmatic values. There was no significant difference in the observed elastic behavior of normal and ectatic corneas under physiologically relevant stress levels. Conclusion: VL irradiation did not cause regression of corneal steepening in a collagenase-induced model during short-term observation.

Indexed as

animal modelcollagenasecorneal cross-linkingkeratoconusviolet light

Identifiers

PMID37293308
PMCPMC10246739
OpenAlexW4378071986

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.