ArticleAmerican journal of cancer research2023
Development and validation of immunogenic cell death-applied prediction model for esophageal carcinoma.
Article in American journal of cancer research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Integrated transcriptomic analysis and machine learning identify immunogenic cell death genes as prognostic markers and therapeutic targets in non-small cell lung cancer.Translational cancer research · 2026Article
- Machine learning-based construction of Immunogenic cell death-related score for improving prognosis and personalized treatment in glioma.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- The enhancement of immunoactivity induced by immunogenic cell death through serine/threonine kinase 10 inhibition: a potential therapeutic strategy.Frontiers in immunology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Evidence suggests that immunogenic cell death (ICD) releases cancer antigens that promote cytotoxic T-cell responses, potentially improving immunotherapy. However, the relationship between ICDs and esophageal cancer (EC) remains unclear. This study aimed to determine the role of ICDs in EC and to construct an ICD-based prognostic panel. RNA-seq data of EC and the corresponding clinical information were downloaded from the UCSC-Xena platform to explore the association between ICD gene expression and EC prognosis. The GSE53625 dataset was used to validate the proposed model. Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between different molecular subtypes were identified to construct a new ICD-related prognosis panel and generate molecular subtypes using ConsensusClusterPlus. We created a prognostic profile based on the ICD and a nomogram based on the risk score. Compared with normal samples, ICD gene expression of malignant samples were significantly increased. 161 patients with EC were successfully divided into three subtypes (SubA, SubB, and SubC). Patients with EC in the SubC group had the best survival and lowest ICD score, whereas patients in the SubB group had the worst prognosis. DEGs between subtypes were evaluated, and risk panels were established using LASSO-Cox regression analysis. The prognosis of low-risk patients was significantly better than that of high-risk patients in both cohorts. The area under the curve of the receiver operating characteristic curve indicated that the risk group had a good prognostic value. Our study identified the molecular subtypes of EC and ICD-based prognostic signatures. Our three-gene risk panel could serve as a biomarker for effectively assessing the prognostic risk of patients with EC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
37293167PMC10244091W4379967413What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.