ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2023
Intensity- and frequency-specific effects of transcranial alternating current stimulation are explained by network dynamics.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) can be used to non-invasively entrain neural activity, and thereby cause changes in local neural oscillatory power. Despite an increased use in cognitive and clinical neuroscience, the fundamental mechanisms of tACS are still not fully understood. Here, we develop a computational neuronal network model of two-compartment pyramidal neurons and inhibitory interneurons which mimic the local cortical circuits. We model tACS with electric field strengths that are achievable in human applications. We then simulate intrinsic network activity and measure neural entrainment to investigate how tACS modulates ongoing endogenous oscillations. First, we show that intensity-specific effects of tACS are non-linear. At low intensities (<0.3 mV/mm), tACS desynchronizes neural firing relative to the endogenous oscillations. At higher intensities (>0.3 mV/mm), neurons are entrained to the exogenous electric field. We then further explore the stimulation parameter space and find that entrainment of ongoing cortical oscillations also depends on frequency by following an Arnold tongue. Moreover, neuronal networks can amplify the tACS induced entrainment via excitation-inhibition balance. Our model shows that pyramidal neurons are directly entrained by the exogenous electric field and drive the inhibitory neurons. Our findings can thus provide a mechanistic framework for understanding the intensity- and frequency- specific effects of oscillating electric fields on neuronal networks. This is crucial for rational parameters selection for tACS in cognitive studies and clinical applications.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.