Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37293070›Full record

ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2023

A reproducibility evaluation of the effects of MRI defacing on brain segmentation.

Chenyu Gao, Bennett A Landman, Jerry L Prince, Aaron Carass

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Chenyu GaoVanderbilt University, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Nashville, Tennessee, 37235.
Bennett A LandmanVanderbilt University, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Nashville, Tennessee, 37235.
Jerry L PrinceThe Johns Hopkins University, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Baltimore, Maryland, 21218.
Aaron CarassThe Johns Hopkins University, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Baltimore, Maryland, 21218.

Funding

Overall: Eunice Kennedy Shriver Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities Research Center at VanderbiltP50HD103537 · NICHD · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI Lea K Davis · 2020 to 2026
$10.3M
Controlling Quality and Capturing Uncertainty in Advanced Diffusion Weighted MRIR01EB017230 · NIBIB · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI LANDMAN, BENNETT A. · 2015 to 2024
$5.1M
Segmenting the subarachnoid space and dura from clinical MRIR21NS120286 · NINDS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI PRINCE, JERRY L · 2020 to 2020
$454k
NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB017230NINDS NIH HHS R21 NS120286
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Recent advances in magnetic resonance (MR) scanner quality and the rapidly improving nature of facial recognition software have necessitated the introduction of MR defacing algorithms to protect patient privacy. As a result, there are a number of MR defacing algorithms available to the neuroimaging community, with several appearing in just the last five years. While some qualities of these defacing algorithms, such as patient identifiability, have been explored in previous works, the potential impact of defacing on neuroimage processing has yet to be explored. Approach: We qualitatively evaluate eight MR defacing algorithms on 179 subjects from the OASIS-3 cohort and the 21 subjects from the Kirby-21 dataset. We also evaluate the effects of defacing on two neuroimaging pipelines-SLANT and FreeSurfer-by comparing the segmentation consistency between the original and defaced images. Results: Defacing can alter brain segmentation and even lead to catastrophic failures, which are more frequent with some algorithms such as Conclusions: The effects of defacing are noticeable and should not be disregarded. Extra attention, in particular, should be paid to the possibility of catastrophic failures. It is crucial to adopt a robust defacing algorithm and perform a thorough quality check before releasing defaced datasets. To improve the reliability of analysis in scenarios involving defaced MRIs, it's encouraged to include multiple brain segmentation pipelines.

Indexed as

brain segmentationdefacingMRI

Identifiers

PMID37293070
PMCPMC10246049

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.