Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37292916›Full record

ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2024

A gradual transition toward categorical representations along the visual hierarchy during working memory, but not perception.

Chaipat Chunharas, Michael J Wolff, Meike D Hettwer, Rosanne L Rademaker

Open access · greenAbstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Chaipat ChunharasDepartment of Medicine, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Michael J WolffErnst Strüngmann Institute (ESI) for Neuroscience in Cooperation with the Max Planck Society, Frankfurt, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1225-2294
Meike D HettwerMax Planck School of Cognition, Max Planck Institute of Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Leipzig, Germany.
Rosanne L RademakerErnst Strüngmann Institute (ESI) for Neuroscience in Cooperation with the Max Planck Society, Frankfurt, Germany.
Ernst Strüngmann Institute for Neuroscience · DEChulalongkorn University · THMax Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences · DE

Funding

The Distinction Between Number and Resolution in Visual Working MemoryR01MH087214 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF OREGON · PI AWH, EDWARD, VOGEL, EDWARD K · 2009 to 2023
$11.0M
Adaptive population codes for flexible visually-guided behaviorsR01EY025872 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI John T Serences · 2016 to 2026
$4.5M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY025872NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH087214
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ability to stably maintain visual information over brief delays is central to healthy cognitive functioning, as is the ability to differentiate such internal representations from external inputs. One possible way to achieve both is via multiple concurrent mnemonic representations along the visual hierarchy that differ systematically from the representations of perceptual inputs. To test this possibility, we examine orientation representations along the visual hierarchy during perception and working memory. Human participants directly viewed, or held in mind, oriented grating patterns, and the similarity between fMRI activation patterns for different orientations was calculated throughout retinotopic cortex. During direct viewing of grating stimuli, similarity was relatively evenly distributed amongst all orientations, while during working memory the similarity was higher around oblique orientations. We modeled these differences in representational geometry based on the known distribution of orientation information in the natural world: The "veridical" model uses an efficient coding framework to capture hypothesized representations during visual perception. The "categorical" model assumes that different "psychological distances" between orientations result in orientation categorization relative to cardinal axes. During direct perception, the veridical model explained the data well. During working memory, the categorical model gradually gained explanatory power over the veridical model for increasingly anterior retinotopic regions. Thus, directly viewed images are represented veridically, but once visual information is no longer tethered to the sensory world there is a gradual progression to more categorical mnemonic formats along the visual hierarchy.

Indexed as

categorizationefficient codingparietal cortexrepresentational geometryrepresentational similarityRSAsensory recruitmentvisual cortexvisual perceptionvisual working memory

Identifiers

PMID37292916
PMCPMC10245673
OpenAlexW4377014342

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.