ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2023
Implications of variable synaptic weights for rate and temporal coding of cerebellar outputs.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Purkinje cell (PC) synapses onto cerebellar nuclei (CbN) neurons convey signals from the cerebellar cortex to the rest of the brain. PCs are inhibitory neurons that spontaneously fire at high rates, and many uniform sized PC inputs are thought to converge onto each CbN neuron to suppress or eliminate firing. Leading theories maintain that PCs encode information using either a rate code, or by synchrony and precise timing. Individual PCs are thought to have limited influence on CbN neuron firing. Here, we find that single PC to CbN synapses are highly variable in size, and using dynamic clamp and modelling we reveal that this has important implications for PC-CbN transmission. Individual PC inputs regulate both the rate and timing of CbN firing. Large PC inputs strongly influence CbN firing rates and transiently eliminate CbN firing for several milliseconds. Remarkably, the refractory period of PCs leads to a brief elevation of CbN firing prior to suppression. Thus, PC-CbN synapses are suited to concurrently convey rate codes, and generate precisely-timed responses in CbN neurons. Variable input sizes also elevate the baseline firing rates of CbN neurons by increasing the variability of the inhibitory conductance. Although this reduces the relative influence of PC synchrony on the firing rate of CbN neurons, synchrony can still have important consequences, because synchronizing even two large inputs can significantly increase CbN neuron firing. These findings may be generalized to other brain regions with highly variable sized synapses.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.