Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37292830›Full record

ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2024

Keyphrase Identification Using Minimal Labeled Data with Hierarchical Contexts and Transfer Learning.

Rohan Goli, Keerthana Komatineni, Shailesh Alluri, Nina Hubig, Hua Min, Yang Gong, Dean F Sittig, Lior Rennert, David Robinson, Paul Biondich and 7 more

Open access · greenAbstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 9 institutions in 4 countries.

Rohan GoliSchool of Computing, College of Engineering, Computing and Applied Science, Clemson University, Clemson, SC, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2354-4938
Keerthana KomatineniSchool of Computing, College of Engineering, Computing and Applied Science, Clemson University, Clemson, SC, USA.
Shailesh AlluriSchool of Computing, College of Engineering, Computing and Applied Science, Clemson University, Clemson, SC, USA.
Nina HubigSchool of Computing, College of Engineering, Computing and Applied Science, Clemson University, Clemson, SC, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8911-7832
Hua MinDepartment of Health Administration and Policy, College of Public Health, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2422-0043
Yang GongSchool of Biomedical Informatics, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0864-8368
Dean F SittigSchool of Biomedical Informatics, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5811-8915
Lior RennertDepartment of Public Health Sciences, College of Behavioral, Social, and Health Sciences, Clemson University, Clemson, SC, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5275-7273
David RobinsonGeneral Practitioner/Independent Consultant, Cumbria, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2044-0754
Paul BiondichClem McDonald Biomedical Informatics Center, Regenstrief Institute, Department of Pediatrics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Adam WrightVanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
Christian NøhrDepartment of Planning, Faculty of Engineering, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-1299-7365
Timothy LawOhio Musculoskeletal and Neurologic Institute, Ohio University, Athens, OH, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3899-072X
Arild FaxvaagDepartment of Neuromedicine and Movement Science, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-6510-7306
Aneesa WeaverDepartment of Public Health Sciences, College of Behavioral, Social, and Health Sciences, Clemson University, Clemson, SC, USA.
Ronald GimbelDepartment of Public Health Sciences, College of Behavioral, Social, and Health Sciences, Clemson University, Clemson, SC, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8185-4013
Xia JingDepartment of Public Health Sciences, College of Behavioral, Social, and Health Sciences, Clemson University, Clemson, SC, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1916-4588
Clemson University · USThe University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston · USAalborg University · DKGeorge Mason University · USNorwegian University of Science and Technology · NOOhio University · USRegenstrief Institute · USUniversity of Cumbria · GBVanderbilt University Medical Center · US

Funding

Tissue Structural and Neural Remodeling in Human Sacroiliac JointP20GM121342 · NIGMS · CLEMSON UNIVERSITY · PI Hai Yao · 2018 to 2026
$24.7M
Open, interoperable, and configurable clinical decision support modules for OpenMRS, OpenEMR, and beyondR01GM138589 · NIGMS · CLEMSON UNIVERSITY · PI JING, XIA · 2020 to 2024
$1.9M
SC Biomedical Informatics & Data Science for Health Impact (SC BIDS4Health)T15LM013977 · NLM · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI Alexander V Alekseyenko, Brian Dean · 2022 to 2026
$1.2M
NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM121342NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM138589NLM NIH HHS T15 LM013977
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Interoperable clinical decision support system (CDSS) rules provide a pathway to interoperability, a well-recognized challenge in health information technology. Building an ontology facilitates creating interoperable CDSS rules, which can be achieved by identifying the keyphrases (KP) from the existing literature. Ontology construction is traditionally a manual effort by human domain experts, and the newly advanced natural language processing techniques, such as KP identification, can be a critical complementary automatic part of building ontology. However, KP identification requires human expertise, consensus, and contextual understanding for data labeling. Methods: This paper presents a semi-supervised KP identification framework (long short-term memory-based encoders and the conditional random fields -based decoder models, BiLSTM-CRF) using minimal human labeled data based on hierarchical attention (i.e., at word, sentence, and abstract levels) over the documents and domain adaptation. We created synthetic labels for initial training and human-labeled data for fine-tuning. We also tested different options during NLP preprocessing and ML training to optimize the ML pipeline. Results: Our method outperforms the prior neural architectures by learning through synthetic labels for initial training, document-level contextual learning, language modeling, and fine-tuning with limited gold standard label data. After comparison, we found that the BIO encoding schema performed slightly better than Blue, and domain adaptation techniques can improve the quality of synthetic labels. In addition, document-level context, pre-trained LM, and pre-trained WE all contributed to better model performance in our tasks. Add 2 to 4 human-labeled documents for every 100 synthetic labeled documents improves the model performance without exhausting human-labeled documents too quickly. Conclusions: To the best of our knowledge, this is the first functional framework for the CDSS sub-domain to identify KPs, which is trained on limited human labeled data. It contributes to the general natural language processing (NLP) architectures in areas such as clinical NLP, where manual data labeling is challenging, and light-weighted deep learning models play an important role in real-time KP identification as a complementary approach to human experts' effort.

Indexed as

Clinical Decision Support SystemDomain adaptationHierarchical contextMinimal labeled dataNatural language processingSemi-supervised learning

Identifiers

PMID37292830
PMCPMC10246160
OpenAlexW4318159679

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.