ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2023
Harmonization of CSF and imaging biomarkers for Alzheimer's disease biomarkers: need and practical applications for genetics studies and preclinical classification.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionIn Alzheimer's disease (AD) research, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) Amyloid beta (Aβ), Tau and pTau are the most accepted and well validated biomarkers. Several methods and platforms exist to measure those biomarkers which leads to challenges in combining data across studies. Thus, there is a need to identify methods that harmonize and standardize these values.
methodsWe used a Z-score based approach to harmonize CSF and amyloid imaging data from multiple cohorts and compared GWAS result using this method with currently accepted methods. We also used a generalized mixture modelling to calculate the threshold for biomarker-positivity.
resultsZ-scores method performed as well as meta-analysis and did not lead to any spurious results. Cutoffs calculated with this approach were found to be very similar to those reported previously. DISCUSSION: This approach can be applied to heterogeneous platforms and provides biomarker cut-offs consistent with the classical approaches without requiring any additional data.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.