Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37292689›Full record

ArticleResearch square2023

Record linkage without patient identifiers: proof of concept using data from South Africa's national HIV program.

Khumbo Shumba, Jacob Bor, Cornelius Nattey, Dickman Gareta, Evelyn Lauren, William Macleod, Matthew P Fox, Adrian Puren, Koleka Mlisana, Dorina Onoya

Open access · greenAbstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in Research square, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Khumbo ShumbaUniversity of the Witwatersrand.
Jacob BorBoston University.
Cornelius NatteyUniversity of the Witwatersrand.
Dickman GaretaAfrica Health Research Institute.
Evelyn LaurenBoston University.
William MacleodBoston University.
Matthew P FoxBoston University.
Adrian PurenNational Health Laboratory Service.
Koleka MlisanaNational Health Laboratory Service.
Dorina OnoyaUniversity of the Witwatersrand.
University of the Witwatersrand · ZANational Health Laboratory Service · ZAAfrica Health Research Institute · ZA

Funding

Evaluating UTT with a National HIV Cohort to Optimize South Africa's HIV Response (ENCORE)R01AI152149 · NIAID · WITS HEALTH CONSORTIUM (PTY), LTD · PI BOR, JACOB, ONOYA, DORINA · 2020 to 2024
$1.8M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI152149
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Linkage between health databases typically requires identifiers such as patient names and personal identification numbers. We developed and validated a record linkage strategy to combine administrative health databases without the use of patient identifiers, with application to South Africa's public sector HIV treatment program. Methods: We linked CD4 counts and HIV viral loads from South Africa's HIV clinical monitoring database (TIER.Net) and the National Health Laboratory Service (NHLS) for patients receiving care between 2015-2019 in Ekurhuleni District (Gauteng Province). We used a combination of variables related to lab results contained in both databases (result value; specimen collection date; facility of collection; patient year and month of birth; and sex). Exact matching linked on exact linking variable values while caliper matching applied exact matching with linkage on approximate test dates (± 5 days). We then developed a sequential linkage approach utilising specimen barcode matching, then exact matching, and lastly caliper matching. Performance measures were sensitivity and positive predictive value (PPV); share of patients linked across databases; and percent increase in data points for each linkage approach. Results: We attempted to link 2,017,290 lab results from TIER.Net (representing 523,558 unique patients) and 2,414,059 lab results from the NHLS database. Linkage performance was evaluated using specimen barcodes (available for a minority of records in TIER.net) as a "gold standard". Exact matching achieved a sensitivity of 69.0% and PPV of 95.1%. Caliper-matching achieved a sensitivity of 75.7% and PPV of 94.5%. In sequential linkage, we matched 41.9% of TIER.Net labs by specimen barcodes, 51.3% by exact matching, and 6.8% by caliper matching, for a total of 71.9% of labs matched, with PPV=96.8% and Sensitivity = 85.9%. The sequential approach linked 86.0% of TIER.Net patients with at least one lab result to the NHLS database (N=1,450,087). Linkage to the NHLS Cohort increased the number of laboratory results associated with TIER.Net patients by 62.6%. Conclusions: Linkage of TIER.Net and NHLS without patient identifiers attained high accuracy and yield without compromising patient privacy. The integrated cohort provides a more complete view of patients' lab history and could yield more accurate estimates of HIV program indicators.

Indexed as

CD4 countHIVRecord linkageSouth AfricaViral load

Identifiers

PMID37292689
PMCPMC10246237
OpenAlexW4376618753

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.