Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37292661›Full record

ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2023

Bayesian target optimisation for high-precision holographic optogenetics.

Marcus A Triplett, Marta Gajowa, Hillel Adesnik, Liam Paninski

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Marcus A TriplettDepartment of Statistics, Columbia University.
Marta GajowaDepartment of Molecular and Cell Biology, UC Berkeley.
Hillel AdesnikDepartment of Molecular and Cell Biology, UC Berkeley.
Liam PaninskiDepartment of Statistics, Columbia University.

Funding

Validating Theoretical Models with Neurophysiology and OptogeneticsU19NS107613 · NINDS · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI MILLER, KENNETH D, SCANZIANI, MASSIMO · 2018 to 2022
$16.7M
Modeling multi-area dynamics during motor controlU19NS104649 · NINDS · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI HILLMAN, ELIZABETH M. C. · 2017 to 2021
$15.3M
High-throughput Physiological Micro-connectivity Mapping in VivoRF1MH120680 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI ADESNIK, HILLEL · 2019 to 2021
$2.2M
Computational Methods for Precise Holographic Control and Mapping of Neural CircuitsK99NS135649 · NINDS · COLUMBIA UNIV NEW YORK MORNINGSIDE · PI TRIPLETT, MARCUS · 2024 to 2025
$272k
NIMH NIH HHS RF1 MH120680NINDS NIH HHS K99 NS135649NINDS NIH HHS U19 NS104649NINDS NIH HHS U19 NS107613
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Two-photon optogenetics has transformed our ability to probe the structure and function of neural circuits. However, achieving precise optogenetic control of neural ensemble activity has remained fundamentally constrained by the problem of off-target stimulation (OTS): the inadvertent activation of nearby non-target neurons due to imperfect confinement of light onto target neurons. Here we propose a novel computational approach to this problem called Bayesian target optimisation. Our approach uses nonparametric Bayesian inference to model neural responses to optogenetic stimulation, and then optimises the laser powers and optical target locations needed to achieve a desired activity pattern with minimal OTS. We validate our approach in simulations and using data from

Identifiers

PMID37292661
PMCPMC10246014

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.