Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37292525›Full record

ArticleCureus2023

Optimizing the Learner's Role in Feedback: Development of a Feedback-Preparedness Online Application for Medical Students in the Clinical Setting.

Victoria Blouin, Florence Bénard, Florence Pelletier, Sandy Abdo, Léamarie Meloche-Dumas, Bill Kapralos, Adam Dubrowski, Erica Patocskai

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Victoria BlouinFaculty of Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, CAN.
Florence BénardGeneral Surgery, Université de Montréal, Montreal, CAN.
Florence PelletierGeneral Surgery, Université de Montréal, Montreal, CAN.
Sandy AbdoHealth Sciences, Ontario Tech University, Oshawa, CAN.
Léamarie Meloche-DumasGeneral Surgery, Université de Montréal, Montreal, CAN.
Bill KapralosMedical Education and Simulation, maxSIMhealth Group, Ontario Tech University, Oshawa, CAN.
Adam DubrowskiHealth Sciences, Ontario Tech University, Oshawa, CAN.
Erica PatocskaiSurgical Oncology, Université de Montréal, Montreal, CAN.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Feedback is an essential component of medical education, especially during clinical rotations. There is growing interest in learner-related factors that can optimize feedback's efficiency, including goal orientation, reflection, self-assessment, and emotional response. However, no mobile application or curriculum currently exists to specifically address those factors. This technical report describes the concept, design, and learner-based feedback of an innovative online application, available on mobile phones, developed to bridge this gap. Eighteen students in their third or fourth year of medical school provided comments on a pilot version of the application. The majority of learners deemed the module relevant, interesting, and helpful to guide reflection and self-assessment, therefore fostering better preparation before an upcoming feedback session. Minor improvements were suggested in terms of content and format. The learners' initial positive response supports further efforts to engage in validity and evaluation research. Future steps include modifying the mobile application based on learners' comments, evaluating its efficacy in a real clinical setting, and clarifying whether it is most beneficial for mid-rotation or end-of-rotation feedback sessions.

Indexed as

clerkshipfeedbackmedical educationonline applicationself-assessmentteaching

Identifiers

PMID37292525
PMCPMC10247157

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.