Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37292520›Full record

ArticleJournal of multivariate analysis2020

Surface Functional Models.

Ziqi Chen, Jianhua Hu, Hongtu Zhu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of multivariate analysis, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ziqi ChenSchool of Statistics, Key Laboratory of Advanced Theory and Application in Statistics and Data Science - MOE, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200062, P.R. China.
Jianhua HuDepartment of Medicine, Columbia University, New York 10032, U.S.A.
Hongtu ZhuDepartment of Biostatistics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599, U.S.A.

Funding

Tumor Biology and Microenvironment ProgramP30CA013696 · NCI · COLUMBIA UNIV NEW YORK MORNINGSIDE · PI Parisa Tehranifar · 1985 to 2026
$115.3M
Statistical Analysis of Biomedical Imaging Data in Curved SpaceR01MH086633 · NIMH · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI IBRAHIM, JOSEPH G · 2010 to 2018
$2.9M
Analysis of Big Data Squared in Biomedical StudiesR01MH116527 · NIMH · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI ZHANG, HEPING · 2018 to 2022
$2.3M
(PQ10) Enhancing responses to immune checkpoint blockade in melanoma via modulation of the microbiomeR01CA219896 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI WARGO, JENNIFER A. · 2018 to 2022
$2.2M
Novel analysis of association between microbiome and treatment infection in AMLR01AI143886 · NIAID · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI HU, JIANHUA · 2019 to 2023
$2.0M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA013696NCI NIH HHS R01 CA219896NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI143886NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH086633NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH116527
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to develop a new framework of surface functional models (SFM) for surface functional data which contains repeated observations in two domains (typically, time-location). The primary problem of interest is to investigate the relationship between a response and the two domains, where the numbers of observations in both domains within a subject may be diverging. The SFMs are far beyond the multivariate functional models with two-dimensional predictor variables. Unprecedented complexity presented in the surface functional models, such as possibly distinctive sampling designs and the dependence between the two domains, makes our models more complex than the existing ones. We provide a comprehensive investigation of the asymptotic properties of the local linear estimator of the mean function based on a general weighting scheme, including equal weight (EW), direction-to-denseness weight (DDW) and subject-to-denseness weight (SDW), as special cases. Moreover, we can mathematically categorize the surface data into nine cases according to the sampling designs (sparse, dense, and ultra-dense) of both the domains, essentially based on the relative order of the number of observations in each domain to the sample size. We derive the specific asymptotic theories and optimal bandwidth orders in each of the nine sampling design cases under all the three weighting schemes. The three weighting schemes are compared theoretically and numerically. We also examine the finite-sample performance of the estimators through simulation studies and an autism study involving white-matter fiber skeletons.

Indexed as

62G2062H3562M1062M30Covariance structureEfficiencyPrimary 62H12Secondary 62G05Surface functional responseTime-spatial processUniform convergenceWeighting schemes

Identifiers

PMID37292520
PMCPMC10249785

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.