Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37292457›Full record

ArticleBrain communications2023

Limited value of serum neurofilament light chain in diagnosing amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.

Jennifer C Davies, Thanuja Dharmadasa, Alexander G Thompson, Evan C Edmond, Katie Yoganathan, Jiali Gao, Kevin Talbot, Martin R Turner

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain communications, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Drug repurposing in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS).Expert opinion on drug discovery · 2025
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Plasma proteomic profiles of UK Biobank participants with multiple sclerosis.Annals of clinical and translational neurology · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jennifer C Davies
Thanuja Dharmadasa
Evan C EdmondNuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX3 9DU, UK.
Katie YoganathanNuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX3 9DU, UK.
Jiali GaoNuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX3 9DU, UK.
Kevin TalbotNuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX3 9DU, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5490-1697
Martin R TurnerNuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX3 9DU, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0267-3180
University of Oxford · GBJohn Radcliffe Hospital · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/T006927/1Motor Neurone Disease Association TURNER/OCT18/989-797
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A biomarker specific for the diagnosis of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis must be sensitive across a spectrum of clinical heterogeneity. Neurofilament light chain levels in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis correlate with the rate of disability progression. Previous attempts to establish a diagnostic role for neurofilament light chain have been limited to comparison with healthy individuals or controls with alternative diagnoses unlikely to be confused with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis in real-world clinical practice. In a tertiary amyotrophic lateral sclerosis referral clinic, at first visit, serum was taken for neurofilament light chain measurement after prospectively recording the clinical diagnosis as 'amyotrophic lateral sclerosis', 'primary lateral sclerosis', 'alternative' or 'currently uncertain'. Of 133 referrals, 93 patients were diagnosed with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (median neurofilament light chain 218.1 pg/ml, interquartile range 130.7-311.9), three primary lateral sclerosis (65.6, 51.5-106.9) and 19 alternative diagnoses (45.2, 13.5-71.9) at first visit. Of 18 initially uncertain diagnoses, eight were subsequently diagnosed with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (98.5, 45.3-300.1). Neurofilament light chain ≥110.9 pg/ml had a positive predictive value of 0.92 for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis; <110.9 pg/ml had a negative predictive value of 0.48. In a specialized clinic, neurofilament light chain is largely confirmatory to clinical judgement in diagnosing amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and has limited ability to exclude alternative diagnoses. The current, important, value of neurofilament light chain is its potential to stratify patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis by disease activity and as a biomarker in therapeutic trials.

Indexed as

biomarkerdiagnosisneurofilament light chainprognosis

Identifiers

PMID37292457
PMCPMC10244039
OpenAlexW4377157930

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.