ArticleFrontiers in pediatrics2023
Beyond brain injury biomarkers: chemoattractants and circulating progenitor cells as biomarkers of endogenous rehabilitation effort in preterm neonates with encephalopathy.
Article in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Trial
- Diagnostic performance of serum neuron-specific enolase for cranial ultrasound-detected brain injury in preterm neonates.Translational pediatrics · 2026Article
- Article
- Circulating CD34 Positive Cells and Immunological Responses in Extremely Preterm Infants.Journal of blood medicine · 2025Article
- Effectiveness of amplitude-integrated electroencephalography combined with neuron-specific enolase level in predicting neonatal brain injury and prognosis.American journal of translational research · 2024Article
- Endothelial progenitor cells in pregnancy-related diseases.Clinical science (London, England : 1979) · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Preclinical work and studies in adults have shown that endogenous regeneration efforts that involve mobilization of progenitor cells take place after brain injury. However, kinetics of endogenous circulating progenitor cells (CPCs) in preterm neonates is not well described, particularly their possible role regarding brain injury and regeneration. We aimed to assess the kinetics of CPCs in neonates with encephalopathy of prematurity in relation to brain injury biomarkers, chemoattractants and relevant antenatal and postanal clinical factors, in an effort to outline the related pathophysiology. Materials and methods: 47 preterm neonates (of 28-33 weeks GA) were enrolled: 31 newborns with no or minimal brain injury (grade I IVH) and 16 prematures with encephalopathy (grade III or IV IVH, PVL or infarct). Peripheral blood samples obtained on days 1, 3, 9, 18 and 45 after birth were analyzed using flow cytometry, focusing on EPCs (early and late Endothelial Progenitor Cells), HSCs (Hematopoietic Stem Cells) and VSELs (Very Small Embryonic-Like Stem Cells). At the same time-points serum levels of S100B, Neuron-specific Enolase (NSE), Erythropoietin (EPO), Insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) and SDF-1 were also measured. Neonates were assessed postnatally with brain MRI, and with Bayley III developmental test at 2 years of corrected age. Results: Preterms with brain injury proved to have significant increase of S100B and NSE, followed by increase of EPO and enhanced mobilization mainly of HSCs, eEPCs and lEPCs. IGF-1 was rather decreased in this group of neonates. IGF-1 and most CPCs were intense decreased in cases of antenatal or postnatal inflammation. S100B and NSE correlated with neuroimaging and language scale in Bayley III test, providing good prognostic ability. Conclusion: The observed pattern of CPCs' mobilization and its association with neurotrophic factors following preterm brain injury indicate the existence of an endogenous brain regeneration process. Kinetics of different biomarkers and associations with clinical factors contribute to the understanding of the related pathophysiology and might help to early discriminate neonates with adverse outcome. Timely appropriate enhancement of the endogenous regeneration effort, when it is suppressed and insufficient, using neurotrophic factors and exogenous progenitor cells might be a powerful therapeutic strategy in the future to restore brain damage and improve the neurodevelopmental outcome in premature infants with brain injury.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.