ArticleHeliyon2023
Face time with physicians: How do patients assess providers in video-visits?
Article in Heliyon, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- From words to action? A scoping review on automatic sentiment analysis of patient experience comments from online sources and surveys.BMJ health & care informatics · 2025Article
- Innovative Applications of Telemedicine and Other Digital Health Solutions in Pain Management: A Literature Review.Pain and therapy · 2024Review
- Outpatient Video Visits During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Cross-Sectional Survey Study of Patients' Experiences and Characteristics.Journal of medical Internet research · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The COVID-19 pandemic has triggered a massive acceleration in the use of virtual and video-visits. As more patients and providers engage in video-visits over varied digital platforms, it is important to understand how patients assess their providers and the video-visit experiences. We also need to examine the relative importance of the factors that patients use in their assessment of video-visits in order to improve the overall healthcare experience and delivery. Methods: A data set of 5149 reviews of patients completing a video-visit was assembled through web scraping. Sentiment analysis was performed on the reviews and topic modeling was used to extract latent topics embedded in the reviews and their relative importance. Results: Most patient reviews (89.53%) reported a positive sentiment towards their providers in video-visits. Seven distinct topics underlying the reviews were identified: bedside manners, professional expertise, virtual experience, appointment scheduling and follow-up process, wait times, costs, and communication. Communication, bedside manners and professional expertise were the top factors patients alluded to in the positive reviews. Appointment-scheduling and follow-ups, wait-times, costs, virtual experience and professional expertise were important factors in the negative reviews. Discussion: To improve the overall experience of patients in video-visits, providers need to engage in clear communication, grow excellent bedside and
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.