ArticleHeliyon2023
Economic evaluation of groundwater resource in the Effutu Municipality: An application of the Gisser-Sanchez effect.
Article in Heliyon, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study presents an economic valuation of the groundwater resource in the Effutu Municipality. It tests the validity of the Gisser-Sanchez's position that the benefits derived from implementing a groundwater management intervention are insignificantly small compared to when no intervention is made. Hundred groundwater-user households were sampled by quota, convenience, and simple random sampling techniques. Assuming a quantitative approach, a contingent valuation-based willingness to pay questionnaire was used for data collection. Respondents were asked to value groundwater under two regimes based on quality: (1) unmanaged quality and (2) hypothetically-managed quality regimes. Using the Lancaster demand theory, the values assigned under either regime were assumed as the benefits users would derive from using groundwater. The statistical difference between the benefits of the two regimes was established by the Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test. The findings revealed that groundwater users are willing to pay 20 Pesewas (GH₵ 0.2) and 30 Pesewas (GH₵ 0.3), respectively, for a 10 L bucket of groundwater from the unmanaged quality regime and groundwater from the hypothetically-managed quality regime. The study established a statistically significant difference between the economic values of groundwater under either regime, indicating that the Gisser-Sanchez effect does not hold for groundwater used for drinking and domestic purposes in the Effutu Municipality. It has been expressed that improving groundwater quality will significantly increase the economic value of the resource. It has therefore been recommended that efforts should be made to treat groundwater to assume the quality of the Ghana Water Company's pipe-borne water after drilling projects in the Municipality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.