Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37292179›Full record

ArticleOphthalmology science2023

Reticular Pseudodrusen: Interreader Agreement of Evaluation on OCT Imaging in Age-Related Macular Degeneration.

Zhichao Wu, Steffen Schmitz-Valckenberg, Barbara A Blodi, Frank G Holz, Glenn J Jaffe, Sandra Liakopoulos, Srinivas R Sadda, Mari Bonse, Tyler Brown, John Choong and 10 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ophthalmology science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 7 institutions in 3 countries.

Zhichao WuCentre for Eye Research Australia, Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital, East Melbourne, Australia.
Steffen Schmitz-ValckenbergDepartment of Ophthalmology and GRADE Reading Center, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Barbara A BlodiDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Wisconsin Reading Center (WRC), University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin.
Frank G HolzDepartment of Ophthalmology and GRADE Reading Center, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Glenn J JaffeDepartment of Ophthalmology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina.
Sandra LiakopoulosCologne Image Reading Center and Laboratory (CIRCL) and Department of Ophthalmology, University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Srinivas R SaddaDoheny Imaging Reading Center (DIRC) and Doheny Eye Institute, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, California.
Mari BonseCologne Image Reading Center and Laboratory (CIRCL) and Department of Ophthalmology, University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Tyler BrownUtah Retinal Reading Center (UREAD) John A. Moran Eye Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah.
John ChoongDepartment of Ophthalmology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina.
Bailey CliftonUtah Retinal Reading Center (UREAD) John A. Moran Eye Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah.
Giulia CorradettiDoheny Imaging Reading Center (DIRC) and Doheny Eye Institute, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, California.
Federico CorviDoheny Imaging Reading Center (DIRC) and Doheny Eye Institute, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, California.
Andrew C DieuDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Wisconsin Reading Center (WRC), University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin.
Vivienne DoolingCologne Image Reading Center and Laboratory (CIRCL) and Department of Ophthalmology, University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Jeong W PakDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Wisconsin Reading Center (WRC), University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin.
Marlene SaßmannshausenDepartment of Ophthalmology and GRADE Reading Center, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Cindy SkalakDepartment of Ophthalmology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina.
Sarah ThieleDepartment of Ophthalmology and GRADE Reading Center, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Robyn H GuymerCentre for Eye Research Australia, Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital, East Melbourne, Australia.
University of Bonn · DEDuke University · USUniversity of California, Los Angeles · USThe University of Melbourne · AUUniversity of Cologne · DEUniversity of Utah · USGoethe University Frankfurt · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To determine the interreader agreement for reticular pseudodrusen (RPD) assessment on combined infrared reflectance (IR) and OCT imaging in the early stages of age-related macular degeneration across a range of different criteria to define their presence. Design: Interreader agreement study. Participants: Twelve readers from 6 reading centers. Methods: All readers evaluated 100 eyes from individuals with bilateral large drusen for the following: (1) the presence of RPD across a range of different criteria and (2) the number of Stage 2 or 3 RPD lesions (from 0 to ≥ 5 lesions) on an entire OCT volume scan and on a selected OCT B-scan. Supportive information was available from the corresponding IR image. Main Outcome Measures: Interreader agreement, as assessed by Gwet's first-order agreement coefficient (AC Results: When evaluating an entire OCT volume scan, there was substantial interreader agreement for the presence of any RPD, any or ≥ 5 Stage 2 or 3 lesions, and ≥ 5 definite lesions on Conclusions: There was generally substantial or near-substantial-but not near-perfect-agreement for assessing the presence of RPD on entire OCT volume scans or selected B-scans across a range of differing RPD criteria. These findings underscore how interreader variability would likely contribute to the variability of findings related to the clinical associations of RPD. The low levels of agreement for assessing RPD number on OCT B-scans underscore the likely challenges of quantifying RPD extent with manual grading. Financial Disclosures: Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found after the references.

Indexed as

Age-related macular degenerationDrusenOCTReticular pseudodrusenSubretinal drusenoid deposits

Identifiers

PMID37292179
PMCPMC10244688
OpenAlexW4372218288

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.