Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37292137›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neurology2023

Automated MRI quantification of volumetric per-muscle fat fractions in the proximal leg of patients with muscular dystrophies.

Lotte Huysmans, Bram De Wel, Kristl G Claeys, Frederik Maes

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Magnetic Resonance Imaging Biomarkers of Muscle.Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.) · 2024
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Lotte HuysmansProcessing Speech and Images, Department of Electrical Engineering, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Bram De WelLaboratory for Muscle Diseases and Neuropathies, Department of Neurosciences, KU Leuven, and Leuven Brain Institute, Leuven, Belgium.
Kristl G ClaeysLaboratory for Muscle Diseases and Neuropathies, Department of Neurosciences, KU Leuven, and Leuven Brain Institute, Leuven, Belgium.
Frederik MaesProcessing Speech and Images, Department of Electrical Engineering, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
KU Leuven · BEVIB-KU Leuven Center for Brain & Disease Research · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Muscular dystrophies (MD) are a class of rare genetic diseases resulting in progressive muscle weakness affecting specific muscle groups, depending on the type of disease. Disease progression is characterized by the gradual replacement of muscle tissue by fat, which can be assessed with fat-sensitive magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and objectively evaluated by quantifying the fat fraction percentage (FF%) per muscle. Volumetric quantification of fat replacement over the full 3D extent of each muscle is more precise and potentially more sensitive than 2D quantification in few selected slices only, but it requires an accurate 3D segmentation of each muscle individually, which is time consuming when this has to be performed manually for a large number of muscles. A reliable, largely automated approach for 3D muscle segmentation is thus needed to facilitate the adoption of fat fraction quantification as a measure of MD disease progression in clinical routine practice, but this is challenging due to the variable appearance of the images and the ambiguity in the discrimination of the contours of adjacent muscles, especially when the normal image contrast is affected and diminished by the fat replacement. To deal with these challenges, we used deep learning to train AI-models to segment the muscles in the proximal leg from knee to hip in Dixon MRI images of healthy subjects as well as patients with MD. We demonstrate state-of-the-art segmentation results of all 18 muscles individually in terms of overlap (Dice score, DSC) with the manual ground truth delineation for images of cases with low fat infiltration (mean overall FF%: 11.3%; mean DSC: 95.3% per image, 84.4-97.3% per muscle) as well as with medium and high fat infiltration (mean overall FF%: 44.3%; mean DSC: 89.0% per image, 70.8-94.5% per muscle). In addition, we demonstrate that the segmentation performance is largely invariant to the field of view of the MRI scan, is generalizable to patients with different types of MD and that the manual delineation effort to create the training set can be drastically reduced without significant loss of segmentation quality by delineating only a subset of the slices.

Indexed as

deep learningfat fraction quantificationmuscle segmentationmuscular dystrophiesquantitative MRI

Identifiers

PMID37292137
PMCPMC10244517
OpenAlexW4378072390

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.