Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37292124›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neurology2023

Effectiveness and tolerability of perampanel monotherapy in children with newly diagnosed focal epilepsy.

Fen Zhao, Ying Ren, Guifu Geng, Tong Zhang, Wandong Hu, Huan Zhang, Ruifeng Jin, Jianguo Shi, Zaifen Gao, Hongwei Zhang and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Fen Zhao *Epilepsy Center, Children's Hospital Affiliated to Shandong University, Jinan, China.
Ying Ren *Epilepsy Center, Children's Hospital Affiliated to Shandong University, Jinan, China.
Guifu Geng *Epilepsy Center, Children's Hospital Affiliated to Shandong University, Jinan, China.
Tong ZhangEpilepsy Center, Children's Hospital Affiliated to Shandong University, Jinan, China.
Wandong HuEpilepsy Center, Children's Hospital Affiliated to Shandong University, Jinan, China.
Huan ZhangEpilepsy Center, Children's Hospital Affiliated to Shandong University, Jinan, China.
Ruifeng JinEpilepsy Center, Children's Hospital Affiliated to Shandong University, Jinan, China.
Jianguo ShiEpilepsy Center, Children's Hospital Affiliated to Shandong University, Jinan, China.
Zaifen GaoEpilepsy Center, Children's Hospital Affiliated to Shandong University, Jinan, China.
Hongwei ZhangEpilepsy Center, Children's Hospital Affiliated to Shandong University, Jinan, China.
Yong LiuEpilepsy Center, Children's Hospital Affiliated to Shandong University, Jinan, China.
Shandong University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To examine the clinical effectiveness and tolerability of perampanel (PER) as initial monotherapy in pediatric patients with newly diagnosed focal epilepsy. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 62 children with newly diagnosed focal epilepsy who were treated with PER at the Epilepsy Center of Jinan Children's Hospital from July 2021 to July 2022. The treatment status, prognosis, and adverse reactions were followed up for a minimum of 6 months after the initiation of PER monotherapy. The effectiveness of the patients was estimated by the PER effective rate at 3-, 6-, and 12-month follow-up evaluations and adverse reactions were also recorded. The effective rates of PER in different etiologies and epilepsy syndromes were also statistically analyzed. Results: The effective rates of PER treatment at the different time points of evaluation were 88.7% (3 months), 79.1% (6 months), and 80.4% (12 months). With PER treatment, seizure freedom varied over time, with 61.3%, 71.0%, and 71.7% of patients at the 3-, 6-, and 12-month follow-ups, respectively. Among the etiologies of epilepsy, the effective rates of genetic etiology, structural etiology, and unknown etiology were generally above 50% at the 3-, 6-, and 12-month follow-ups. Among the epilepsy syndromes, the categories with higher treatment efficacy were self-limiting epilepsy with centrotemporal spikes (SeLECTs), self-limited epilepsy with autonomic seizures (SeLEAS), and childhood occipital visual epilepsy (COVE), with an effective rate of above 80%. Adverse events were documented in 22 patients (35.5%), but they were mild and tolerable. The most common adverse events comprised irritability, drowsiness, dizziness, and increased appetite. Conclusion: PER has favorable effectiveness and tolerability as initial monotherapy for children with newly diagnosed focal epilepsy, which could be a potential option for long-term medication in the treatment of focal epilepsy in children. The current study provided potential evidence for PER as initial monotherapy in children with focal epilepsy in clinical practice.

Indexed as

childreneffectivenessfocal epilepsyperampaneltolerability

Identifiers

PMID37292124
PMCPMC10244641
OpenAlexW4377942476

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.