ArticleCureus2023
Comprehensive Normative Data for Objective Vestibular Tests.
Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Congenital deafness and vestibular disorders: a systematic literature review.Frontiers in neurology · 2024Pooled it
- The Relationship between Chronic Unilateral Hearing Loss, Balance Function, and Falls Is Not Informed by Vestibular Status.Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionVestibular dysfunction is a debilitating disorder frequently encountered in neurological and otological settings. The vestibular system is a complex network between peripheral and central mechanisms. This innate complexity of the vestibular system necessitates objective test procedures for evidence-based diagnostic formulations and intervention. Objective tests aid in the evaluation of both peripheral and central vestibular pathologies. Establishing and availability of comprehensive normative data for these objective tests is crucial for clinicians and researchers alike. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis is a prospective study involving 120 participants (both males and females) aged between 18 and 55 years. All participants were right-handed individuals and had no significant medical history. On pre-set protocols, cVEMP (cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potential), oVEMP (ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potential), vHIT (video head impulse test), and VNG (videonystagmography) were done.
resultsWhile all participants (n=120) underwent cVEMP, oVEMP, vHIT, saccade, smooth pursuit, and optokinetic tests, only 109 participants consented to the caloric test. Each test's mean, standard deviation, median, quartile, and third quartiles have been recorded. A right-left comparison yielded no significant difference on cVEMP, oVEMP, caloric test, smooth pursuit, and optokinetic test. However, few vHIT and saccade parameters did reveal significant differences. DISCUSSION: This study presents comprehensive normative data for cVEMP, oVEMP, vHIT, caloric test on VNG, and oculomotor tests (smooth pursuit, saccade, optokinetic) on VNG. The test results were in concordance with previously published data. The significant difference between the right and left sides in vHIT may be because of the monocular goggles used for the testing.
conclusionThis study brings out the normative data for various vestibular tests on individuals aged between 18-55 years. This information could aid both clinicians and researchers working in the field of vestibular science.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.