ArticleProceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering
Analysis of Deep Ultraviolet Fluorescence Images for Intraoperative Breast Tumor Margin Assessment.
Article in Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Positive margin status after breast-conserving surgery (BCS) is a predictor of higher rates of local recurrence. Intraoperative margin assessment aims to achieve negative surgical margin status at the first operation, thus reducing the re-excision rates that are usually associated with potential surgical complications, increased medical costs, and mental pressure on patients. Microscopy with ultraviolet surface excitation (MUSE) can rapidly image tissue surfaces with subcellular resolution and sharp contrasts by utilizing the nature of the thin optical sectioning thickness of deep ultraviolet light. We have previously imaged 66 fresh human breast specimens that were topically stained with propidium iodide and eosin Y using a customized MUSE system. To achieve objective and automated assessment of MUSE images, a machine learning model is developed for binary (tumor vs. normal) classification of obtained MUSE images. Features extracted by texture analysis and pre-trained convolutional neural networks (CNN) have been investigated for sample descriptions. A sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy better than 90% have been achieved for detecting tumorous specimens. The result suggests the potential of MUSE with machine learning being utilized for intraoperative margin assessment during BCS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.