Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37292032›Full record

ArticleAnnals of clinical and translational neurology2023

Assessing facial weakness in myasthenia gravis with facial recognition software and deep learning.

Annabel M Ruiter, Ziqi Wang, Zhao Yin, Willemijn C Naber, Jerrel Simons, Jurre T Blom, Jan C van Gemert, Jan J G M Verschuuren, Martijn R Tannemaat

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of clinical and translational neurology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Remote Monitoring in Myasthenia Gravis: Exploring Symptom Variability.Annals of clinical and translational neurology · 2026
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Annabel M RuiterDepartment of Neurology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-8608-5871
Ziqi WangVision Lab, Delft University of Technology, Delft, the Netherlands.
Zhao YinVision Lab, Delft University of Technology, Delft, the Netherlands.
Willemijn C NaberDepartment of Neurology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Jerrel SimonsDepartment of Neurology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Jurre T BlomMedical Illustrator at www.jurreblom.nl, Apeldoorn, the Netherlands.
Jan C van GemertVision Lab, Delft University of Technology, Delft, the Netherlands.
Jan J G M VerschuurenDepartment of Neurology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Martijn R TannemaatDepartment of Neurology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Leiden University Medical Center · NLDelft University of Technology · NLGelre Hospitals · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveMyasthenia gravis (MG) is an autoimmune disease leading to fatigable muscle weakness. Extra-ocular and bulbar muscles are most commonly affected. We aimed to investigate whether facial weakness can be quantified automatically and used for diagnosis and disease monitoring.

methodsIn this cross-sectional study, we analyzed video recordings of 70 MG patients and 69 healthy controls (HC) with two different methods. Facial weakness was first quantified with facial expression recognition software. Subsequently, a deep learning (DL) computer model was trained for the classification of diagnosis and disease severity using multiple cross-validations on videos of 50 patients and 50 controls. Results were validated using unseen videos of 20 MG patients and 19 HC.

resultsExpression of anger (p = 0.026), fear (p = 0.003), and happiness (p < 0.001) was significantly decreased in MG compared to HC. Specific patterns of decreased facial movement were detectable in each emotion. Results of the DL model for diagnosis were as follows: area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operator curve 0.75 (95% CI 0.65-0.85), sensitivity 0.76, specificity 0.76, and accuracy 76%. For disease severity: AUC 0.75 (95% CI 0.60-0.90), sensitivity 0.93, specificity 0.63, and accuracy 80%. Results of validation, diagnosis: AUC 0.82 (95% CI: 0.67-0.97), sensitivity 1.0, specificity 0.74, and accuracy 87%. For disease severity: AUC 0.88 (95% CI: 0.67-1.0), sensitivity 1.0, specificity 0.86, and accuracy 94%.

interpretationPatterns of facial weakness can be detected with facial recognition software. Second, this study delivers a 'proof of concept' for a DL model that can distinguish MG from HC and classifies disease severity.

Indexed as

Deep LearningFacial ParalysisFacial RecognitionMyasthenia GravisCross-Sectional StudiesHumansSoftware

Identifiers

PMID37292032
PMCPMC10424649
OpenAlexW4379966477

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.