Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37291829›Full record

ArticleBiophysical journal2023

Deformability and collision-induced reorientation enhance cell topotaxis in dense microenvironments.

Leonie van Steijn, Joeri A J Wondergem, Koen Schakenraad, Doris Heinrich, Roeland M H Merks

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biophysical journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Leonie van SteijnMathematical Institute, Leiden University, Leiden, the Netherlands. Electronic address: l.vansteijn@uu.nl.
Joeri A J WondergemLeiden Institute of Physics, Leiden University, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Koen SchakenraadMathematical Institute, Leiden University, Leiden, the Netherlands; Leiden Institute of Physics, Leiden University, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Doris HeinrichFraunhofer Institute for Silicate Research ISC, Würzburg, Germany; Institute for Bioprocessing and Analytical Measurement Techniques, Heilbad Heiligenstadt, Germany; Faculty for Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Technische Universität Ilmenau, Ilmenau, Germany.
Roeland M H MerksMathematical Institute, Leiden University, Leiden, the Netherlands; Institute of Biology, Leiden University, Leiden, the Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In vivo, cells navigate through complex environments filled with obstacles such as other cells and the extracellular matrix. Recently, the term "topotaxis" has been introduced for navigation along topographic cues such as obstacle density gradients. Experimental and mathematical efforts have analyzed topotaxis of single cells in pillared grids with pillar density gradients. A previous model based on active Brownian particles (ABPs) has shown that ABPs perform topotaxis, i.e., drift toward lower pillar densities, due to decreased effective persistence lengths at high pillar densities. The ABP model predicted topotactic drifts of up to 1% of the instantaneous speed, whereas drifts of up to 5% have been observed experimentally. We hypothesized that the discrepancy between the ABP and the experimental observations could be in 1) cell deformability and 2) more complex cell-pillar interactions. Here, we introduce a more detailed model of topotaxis based on the cellular Potts model (CPM). To model persistent cells we use the Act model, which mimics actin-polymerization-driven motility, and a hybrid CPM-ABP model. Model parameters were fitted to simulate the experimentally found motion of Dictyostelium discoideum on a flat surface. For starved D. discoideum, the topotactic drifts predicted by both CPM variants are closer to the experimental results than the previous ABP model due to a larger decrease in persistence length. Furthermore, the Act model outperformed the hybrid model in terms of topotactic efficiency, as it shows a larger reduction in effective persistence time in dense pillar grids. Also pillar adhesion can slow down cells and decrease topotaxis. For slow and less-persistent vegetative D. discoideum cells, both CPMs predicted a similar small topotactic drift. We conclude that deformable cell volume results in higher topotactic drift compared with ABPs, and that feedback of cell-pillar collisions on cell persistence increases drift only in highly persistent cells.

Indexed as

DictyosteliumExtracellular MatrixMotion

Identifiers

PMID37291829
PMCPMC10397819

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.