Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37291747›Full record

ArticleMolecular ecology resources2025

Management and conservation implications of cryptic population substructure for two commercially exploited fishes (Merluccius spp.) in southern Africa.

Sarah Forde, Sophie von der Heyden, Alan Le Moan, Erica S Nielsen, Deon Durholtz, Paulus Kainge, Johannes N Kathena, Marek R Lipinski, Hilkka O N Ndjaula, Conrad A Matthee and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular ecology resources, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. A new species ofParasitology · 2025
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 8 institutions in 5 countries.

Sarah FordeMarine Genomics Group, Department of Biochemistry, Genetics and Microbiology, University of Pretoria, Hatfield, South Africa.
Sophie von der HeydenEvolutionary Genomics Group, Department of Botany and Zoology, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9166-976X
Alan Le MoanCNRS-Sorbonne Université, Station Biologique de Roscoff, Place Georges Tessier, Roscoff, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9124-6844
Erica S NielsenUniversity of California - Davis, Davis, California, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5439-571X
Deon DurholtzDepartment of Forestry, Fisheries and Environment, Cape Town, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3234-9798
Paulus KaingeNational Marine Information and Research Centre, Ministry of Fisheries and Marine Resources, Swakopmund, Namibia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4498-9845
Johannes N KathenaNational Marine Information and Research Centre, Ministry of Fisheries and Marine Resources, Swakopmund, Namibia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1863-8673
Marek R LipinskiDepartment of Ichthyology and Fisheries Science, Rhodes University, Makhanda, South Africa.
Hilkka O N NdjaulaSam Nujoma Marine and Coastal Resources Research Centre, University of Namibia, Henties Bay, Namibia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2090-7307
Conrad A MattheeEvolutionary Genomics Group, Department of Botany and Zoology, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6836-069X
Romina HenriquesMarine Genomics Group, Department of Biochemistry, Genetics and Microbiology, University of Pretoria, Hatfield, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6544-5532
Marine Research Centre · MVStellenbosch University · ZAUniversity of Pretoria · ZACentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRDepartment of Agriculture, Land Reform and Rural Development · ZARhodes University · ZAUniversity of California, Davis · USUniversity of Namibia · NA

Funding

Directorate-General for Development and Cooperation - EuropeAid 2010/222387National Research Foundation 105949
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genomic information can aid in the establishment of sustainable management plans for commercially exploited marine fishes, aiding in the long-term conservation of these resources. The southern African hakes (Merluccius capensis and M. paradoxus) are commercially valuable demersal fishes with similar distribution ranges but exhibiting contrasting life histories. Using a comparative framework based on Pool-Seq genome-wide SNP data, we investigated whether the evolutionary processes that shaped extant patterns of diversity and divergence are shared among these two congeneric fishes, or unique to each one. Our findings revealed that M. capensis and M. paradoxus show similar levels of genome-wide diversity, despite different census sizes and life-history features. In addition, M. capensis shows three highly structured geographic populations across the Benguela Current region (one in the northern Benguela and two in the southern Benguela), with no consistent genome-environment associations detected. In contrast, although population structure and outlier analyses suggested panmixia for M. paradoxus, reconstruction of its demographic history suggested the presence of an Atlantic-Indian Ocean subtle substructuring pattern. Therefore, it appears that M. paradoxus might be composed by two highly connected populations, one in the Atlantic and one in the southwest Indian Ocean. The reported similar low levels of genomic diversity, as well as newly discovered genetically distinct populations in both hake species can thus assist in informing and improving conservation and management plans for the commercially important southern African Merluccius.

Indexed as

Conservation of Natural ResourcesGadiformesGenetics, PopulationGenetic VariationAfrica, SouthernAnimalsPolymorphism, Single Nucleotideconservation genomicsfisheries managementgenomic diversityPool‐Seqpopulation dynamics

Identifiers

PMID37291747
PMCPMC12142719
OpenAlexW4379966539

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.