Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37291674›Full record

ArticleMovement ecology2023

Predictive model of sperm whale prey capture attempts from time-depth data.

Sergi Pérez-Jorge, Cláudia Oliveira, Esteban Iglesias Rivas, Rui Prieto, Irma Cascão, Paul J Wensveen, Patrick J O Miller, Mónica A Silva

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Movement ecology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Sergi Pérez-Jorge *Institute of Marine Sciences - OKEANOS & Institute of Marine Research - IMAR, University of the Azores, Horta, Portugal. sergiperezjorge@gmail.com.
Cláudia Oliveira *Institute of Marine Sciences - OKEANOS & Institute of Marine Research - IMAR, University of the Azores, Horta, Portugal.
Esteban Iglesias RivasUniversity of Algarve, Campus de Gambelas, Faro, Portugal.
Rui PrietoInstitute of Marine Sciences - OKEANOS & Institute of Marine Research - IMAR, University of the Azores, Horta, Portugal.
Irma CascãoInstitute of Marine Sciences - OKEANOS & Institute of Marine Research - IMAR, University of the Azores, Horta, Portugal.
Paul J WensveenFaculty of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland.
Patrick J O MillerSea Mammal Research Unit, School of Biology, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, Scotland.
Mónica A SilvaInstitute of Marine Sciences - OKEANOS & Institute of Marine Research - IMAR, University of the Azores, Horta, Portugal.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHigh-resolution sound and movement recording tags offer unprecedented insights into the fine-scale foraging behaviour of cetaceans, especially echolocating odontocetes, enabling the estimation of a series of foraging metrics. However, these tags are expensive, making them inaccessible to most researchers. Time-Depth Recorders (TDRs), which have been widely used to study diving and foraging behaviour of marine mammals, offer a more affordable alternative. Unfortunately, data collected by TDRs are bi-dimensional (time and depth only), so quantifying foraging effort from those data is challenging.

methodsA predictive model of the foraging effort of sperm whales (Physeter macrocephalus) was developed to identify prey capture attempts (PCAs) from time-depth data. Data from high-resolution acoustic and movement recording tags deployed on 12 sperm whales were downsampled to 1 Hz to match the typical TDR sampling resolution and used to predict the number of buzzes (i.e., rapid series of echolocation clicks indicative of PCAs). Generalized linear mixed models were built for dive segments of different durations (30, 60, 180 and 300 s) using multiple dive metrics as potential predictors of PCAs.

resultsAverage depth, variance of depth and variance of vertical velocity were the best predictors of the number of buzzes. Sensitivity analysis showed that models with segments of 180 s had the best overall predictive performance, with a good area under the curve value (0.78 ± 0.05), high sensitivity (0.93 ± 0.06) and high specificity (0.64 ± 0.14). Models using 180 s segments had a small difference between observed and predicted number of buzzes per dive, with a median of 4 buzzes, representing a difference in predicted buzzes of 30%.

conclusionsThese results demonstrate that it is possible to obtain a fine-scale, accurate index of sperm whale PCAs from time-depth data alone. This work helps leveraging the potential of time-depth data for studying the foraging ecology of sperm whales and the possibility of applying this approach to a wide range of echolocating cetaceans. The development of accurate foraging indices from low-cost, easily accessible TDR data would contribute to democratize this type of research, promote long-term studies of various species in several locations, and enable analyses of historical datasets to investigate changes in cetacean foraging activity.

Indexed as

BuzzesForaging behaviourLow-resolution dataPhyseter macrocephalusTime-depth recordersVertical movement

Identifiers

PMID37291674
PMCPMC10251647

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.