Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37291665›Full record

ArticleCancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society2023

Patterns of pseudoprogression across different cancer entities treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors.

Sebastian Mönch, Maurice M Heimer, Michael Winkelmann, Anne Guertler, Max Schlaak, Amanda Tufman, Najib Ben Khaled, Enrico de Toni, Christoph B Westphalen, Michael von Bergwelt-Baildon and 8 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Observational
  7. [Abdominal immune-related adverse events : Abdominal focus].Radiologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2026
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. IsCancers · 2024
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sebastian MönchDepartment of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, Munich, 81377, Germany.
Maurice M HeimerDepartment of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, Munich, 81377, Germany.
Michael WinkelmannDepartment of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, Munich, 81377, Germany.
Anne GuertlerDepartment of Dermatology and Allergy, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Max SchlaakDepartment of Dermatology and Allergy, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Amanda TufmanDepartment of Medicine V, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Najib Ben KhaledDepartment of Medicine II, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Enrico de ToniDepartment of Medicine II, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Christoph B WestphalenDepartment of Medicine III, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Michael von Bergwelt-BaildonDepartment of Medicine III, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Julien DinkelDepartment of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, Munich, 81377, Germany.
Philipp M KazmierczakDepartment of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, Munich, 81377, Germany.
Michael IngrischDepartment of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, Munich, 81377, Germany.
Nabeel MansourDepartment of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, Munich, 81377, Germany.
Marcus UnterrainerDepartment of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, Munich, 81377, Germany.
Lucie HeinzerlingDepartment of Dermatology and Allergy, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Jens RickeDepartment of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, Munich, 81377, Germany.
Wolfgang G KunzDepartment of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, Munich, 81377, Germany. wolfgang.kunz@med.lmu.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5021-1952
LMU Klinikum · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPseudoprogression (PsPD) is a rare response pattern to immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy in oncology. This study aims to reveal imaging features of PsPD, and their association to other relevant findings.

methodsPatients with PsPD who had at least three consecutive cross-sectional imaging studies at our comprehensive cancer center were retrospectively analyzed. Treatment response was assessed according to immune Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (iRECIST). PsPD was defined as the occurrence of immune unconfirmed progressive disease (iUPD) without follow-up confirmation. Target lesions (TL), non-target lesions (NTL), new lesions (NL) were analyzed over time. Tumor markers and immune-related adverse events (irAE) were correlated.

resultsThirty-two patients were included (mean age: 66.7 ± 13.6 years, 21.9% female) with mean baseline STL of 69.7 mm ± 55.6 mm. PsPD was observed in twenty-six patients (81.3%) at FU1, and no cases occurred after FU4. Patients with iUPD exhibited the following: TL increase in twelve patients, (37.5%), NTL increase in seven patients (21.9%), NL appearance in six patients (18.8%), and combinations thereof in four patients (12.5%). The mean and maximum increase for first iUPD in sum of TL was 19.8 and 96.8 mm (+ 700.8%). The mean and maximum decrease in sum of TL between iUPD and consecutive follow-up was - 19.1 mm and - 114.8 mm (-60.9%) respectively. The mean and maximum sum of new TL at first iUPD timepoint were 7.6 and 82.0 mm respectively. In two patients (10.5%), tumor-specific serologic markers were elevated at first iUPD, while the rest were stable or decreased among the other PsPD cases (89.5%). In fourteen patients (43.8%), irAE were observed.

conclusionsPsPD occurred most frequently at FU1 after initiation of ICI treatment. The two most prevalent reasons for PsPD were TL und NTL progression, with an increase in TL diameter commonly below + 100%. In few cases, PsPD was observed even if tumor markers were rising compared to baseline. Our findings also suggest a correlation between PsPD and irAE. These findings may guide decision-making of ICI continuation in suspected PsPD.

Indexed as

Immune Checkpoint InhibitorsNeoplasmsAgedAged, 80 and overBiomarkers, TumorDisease ProgressionFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesBiomarkers, TumorImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsAtypical response patternsCancerImmune Checkpoint inhibitorsImmune related adverse eventsPseudoprogression

Identifiers

PMID37291665
PMCPMC10249323
OpenAlexW4379967233

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.