ArticleArthritis research & therapy2023
Enthesitis indices identify different patients with this characteristic in axial and peripheral spondyloarthritis and also in psoriatic arthritis: ASAS-PerSpA data.
Article in Arthritis research & therapy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Early and Mid-Term Ultrasound Response to Guselkumab in Psoriatic Arthritis: A Real-World Cohort from a Single Tertiary Rheumatology Center.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Understanding Enthesitis in Psoriatic Disease: Insights and Implications.American journal of clinical dermatology · 2026Review
- Spondyloarthritis in Latin America: a difficult-to-diagnose challenge.Therapeutic advances in musculoskeletal disease · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA), peripheral SpA (pSpA) and psoriatic arthritis (PsA), enthesitis is a hallmark clinical feature that can be assessed by the SPARCC index, LEI, MASES and MEI. These indices evaluate different locations, which may identify different numbers of patients with enthesitis among SpA subtypes. Thus, the aim of this study was to evaluate whether the proportion of patients with at least one enthesitis across these three most prevalent SpA subtypes differs according to the index used and to evaluate the level of agreement among indices in detecting patients with enthesitis.
methodsA total of 4185 patients (2719 axSpA, 433 pSpA and 1033 PsA) from the international and cross-sectional ASAS-PerSpA study were included. The proportion of patients with enthesitis identified by the indices was evaluated across the three diseases. Pairwise agreement between indices was computed using Cohen's kappa.
resultsThe prevalence rates of patients with at least one enthesitis according to the MEI, MASES, SPARCC index and LEI were 17.2%, 13.5%, 10.7%, and 8.3%, respectively. In axSpA, the indices that identified the most patients with enthesitis were the MEI and MASES (98.7% and 82.4%, respectively); in pSpA and PsA, the indices that identified the most patients with enthesitis were the MEI and SPARCC index (MEI: 100% and SPARCC: 84.6%; MEI: 97.3% and SPARCC: 77%, respectively). In the total population, the MASES vs. MEI showed the strongest agreement (absolute agreement 96.3%; kappa: 0.86); similar results were obtained in axSpA patients (97.3%; 0.90). In pSpA and PsA patients, the SPARCC vs. MEI (97.2%; 0.90 and 95.4%; 0.83, respectively) showed the strongest agreement.
conclusionsThese results suggest that the prevalence of patients with enthesitis across SpA subtypes differs depending on the disease and the index used. The MEI and MASES appeared best for assessing enthesis in SpA and axSpA, while the MEI and SPARCC index appeared best for assessing enthesitis in pSpA and PsA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.