ArticleWorld journal of surgical oncology2023
Gastrointestinal perforation after bevacizumab: a multi-site, single-institution study with a focus on survival.
Article in World journal of surgical oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Gastrointestinal perforation associated with bevacizumab and palliative radiotherapy.International journal of clinical oncology · 2026Article
- Acute abdominal pain in oncology patients: diagnostic challenges and imaging insights.La Radiologia medica · 2026Review
- Early-onset duodenal perforation during bevacizumab-containing chemotherapy in a patient with ovarian cancer: a case report.Journal of pharmaceutical health care and sciences · 2026Article
- Preoperative PARP Inhibitors in Ovarian Cancer Trials: Connecting Molecular Oncology and Cytoreductive Surgery.Cancers · 2026Review
- Analysis of Bevacizumab-Induced Gastrointestinal Perforation Using the Japanese Adverse Drug Event Report Database.Cureus · 2025Article
- Bevacizumab-Related Gastrointestinal Perforation in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patient: A Case Report.Case reports in oncologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundBevacizumab-induced gastrointestinal perforation is a rare but potentially devastating adverse event that has generated limited data on overall survival. Yet, such survival data are critical in guiding management.
methodsThis multi-site, single-institution retrospective study focused on all cancer patients who had received bevacizumab and who had suffered a well-documented gastrointestinal perforation from January 1, 2004 through January 20, 2022.The main goal was to report survival outcomes; Kaplan Meier curves and Cox survival models were used for this purpose.
resultsEighty-nine patients are included in this report with a median age of 62 years (range 26-85). Colorectal cancer was the most common malignancy (n = 42). Thirty-nine patients underwent surgery for the perforation. Seventy-eight were deceased at the time of reporting with an overall median survival of all patients of 2.7 months (range 0-45 months), and 32 (36%) died within 30 days of perforation. In univariable survival analyses, no statistically significant associations were observed for age, gender, corticosteroid use, and time since last bevacizumab dose. However, surgically treated patients manifested a better survival (hazard ratio (HR) 0.49 (95% CI 0.31-0.78); p = 0.003). In multivariable analyses, surgery continued to be associated with improved survival (HR 0.47 (95% CI 0.29-0.74); p = 0.002), and corticosteroid use was associated with worse survival (HR 1.75 (95% CI 1.02-2.99); p = 0.04).
conclusionAlthough gastrointestinal perforation after bevacizumab should be managed on a case-by-case basis, these descriptive survival data can help inform patients, their families, and healthcare providers as challenging management decisions arise.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.