ArticleBMC neurology2023
Microwave ablation combined with vertebral augmentation under real-time temperature monitoring for the treatment of painful spinal osteogenic metastases.
Article in BMC neurology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Exploring the Efficacy of Combining Radiofrequency Thermal Ablation or Microwave Ablation with Vertebroplasty for Pain Control and Disease Management in Metastatic Bone Disease-A Systematic Review.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2024Pooled it
- The safety and efficacy of combined microwave ablation and percutaneous vertebral augmentation for spinal metastasis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of evidence in the last 6 years.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026Review
- Clinical Analysis of Microwave Ablation Combined with Decompression and Pedicle Screw Fixation in the Treatment of Spinal Metastases.Orthopaedic surgery · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo evaluate the safety and efficacy of computed tomography (CT)-guided microwave ablation combined with vertebral augmentation under real-time temperature monitoring in the treatment of painful osteogenic spinal metastases.
methodsThis retrospective study included 38 patients with 63 osteogenic metastatic spinal lesions treated using CT-guided microwave ablation and vertebral augmentation under real-time temperature monitoring. Visual analog scale scores, daily morphine consumption, and Oswestry Disability Index scores were used to evaluate efficacy of the treatment.
resultsMicrowave ablation combined with vertebral augmentation reduced the mean visual analog scale scores from 6.40 ± 1.90 preoperatively to 3.32 ± 0.96 at 24 h, 2.24 ± 0.91 at 1 week, 1.92 ± 1.32 at 4 weeks, 1.79 ± 1.45 at 12 weeks, and 1.39 ± 1.12 at 24 weeks postoperatively (all p < 0.001). The mean preoperative daily morphine consumption was 108.95 ± 56.41 mg, which decreased to 50.13 ± 25.46 mg at 24 h, 31.18 ± 18.58 mg at 1 week, 22.50 ± 16.63 mg at 4 weeks, 21.71 ± 17.68 mg at 12 weeks, and 17.27 ± 16.82 mg at 24 weeks postoperatively (all p < 0.001). During the follow-up period, the Oswestry Disability Index scores significantly reduced (p < 0.001). Bone cement leakage occurred in 25 vertebral bodies, with an incidence of 39.7% (25/63).
conclusionsThe results indicate that microwave ablation combined with vertebral augmentation under real-time temperature monitoring is a feasible, effective, and safe treatment for painful osteoblast spinal metastases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.