ArticleFunctional & integrative genomics2023
Immune-related biomarkers predict the prognosis and immune response of breast cancer based on bioinformatic analysis and machine learning.
Article in Functional & integrative genomics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mapping breast cancer research on monoclonal antibodies: a data-driven approach using VOSviewer, Bibliometrix, and CiteSpace.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2025Article
- BRCAGenie: A machine learning-driven 43-gene polygenic risk score model for precision prediction of breast cancer survival.Journal of translational medicine · 2025Article
- Artificial Intelligence and Breast Cancer Management: From Data to the Clinic.Cancer innovation · 2025Review
- Single-cell RNA-seq combined with bulk RNA-seq explores shared gene signatures between thyroid and breast cancers.Frontiers in genetics · 2025Article
- Advanced machine learning unveils CD8 + T cell genetic markers enhancing prognosis and immunotherapy efficacy in breast cancer.BMC cancer · 2024Article
- The integration of multidisciplinary approaches revealed PTGES3 as a novel drug target for breast cancer treatment.Journal of translational medicine · 2024Article
- Role of UBE2C in Brain Cancer Invasion and Dissemination.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Promoting proliferation and tumorigenesis of breast cancer: KCND2's significance as a prognostic factor.Functional & integrative genomics · 2023Article
- Identification of RNA-binding protein YBX3 as an oncogene in clear cell renal cell carcinoma.Functional & integrative genomics · 2023Article
- Comprehensive multiomics and in silico approach uncovers prognostic, immunological, and therapeutic roles of ANLN in lung adenocarcinoma.Functional & integrative genomics · 2023Article
- Glycolysis induces Th2 cell infiltration and significantly affects prognosis and immunotherapy response to lung adenocarcinoma.Functional & integrative genomics · 2023Article
- Mechanistic Insights into Threonine Tyrosine Kinase Mediated Cell Cycle Regulation in Triple-negative Breast Cancer.Cancer genomics & proteomicsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Breast cancer (BC) is the malignancy with the highest mortality rate among women, identification of immune-related biomarkers facilitates precise diagnosis and improvement of the survival rate in early-stage BC patients. 38 hub genes significantly positively correlated with tumor grade were identified based on weighted gene coexpression network analysis (WGCNA) by integrating the clinical traits and transcriptome analysis. Six candidate genes were screened from 38 hub genes basing on least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO)-Cox and random forest. Four upregulated genes (CDC20, CDCA5, TTK and UBE2C) were identified as biomarkers with the log-rank p < 0.05, in which high expression levels of them showed a poor overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS). A risk model was finally constructed using LASSO-Cox regression coefficients and it possessed superior capability to identify high risk patients and predict OS (p < 0.0001, AUC at 1-, 3- and 5-years are 0.81, 0.73 and 0.79, respectively). Decision curve analysis demonstrated risk score was the best prognostic predictor, and low risk represented a longer survival time and lower tumor grade. Importantly, multiple immune cell types and immunotherapy targets were observed increase in expression levels in high-risk group, most of which were significantly correlated with four genes. In summary, the immune-related biomarkers could accurately predict the prognosis and character the immune responses in BC patients. In addition, the risk model is conducive to the tiered diagnosis and treatment of BC patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
37291471What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.