ArticleJournal of molecular modeling2023
A computational and laboratory approach for the investigation of interactions of peptide conjugated natural terpenes with EpHA2 receptor.
Article in Journal of molecular modeling, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
contextEphrin type A receptor 2 (EphA2) is a well-known drug target for cancer treatment due to its overexpression in numerous types of cancers. Thus, it is crucial to determine the binding interactions of this receptor with both the ligand-binding domain (LBD) and the kinase-binding domain (KBD) through a targeted approach in order to modulate its activity. In this work, natural terpenes with inherent anticancer properties were conjugated with short peptides YSAYP and SWLAY that are known to bind to the LBD of EphA2 receptor. We examined the binding interactions of six terpenes (maslinic acid, levopimaric acid, quinopimaric acid, oleanolic, polyalthic, and hydroxybetulinic acid) conjugated to the above peptides with the ligand-binding domain (LBD) of EphA2 receptor computationally. Additionally, following the "target-hopping approach," we also examined the interactions of the conjugates with the KBD. Our results indicated that most of the conjugates showed higher binding interactions with the EphA2 kinase domain compared to LBD. Furthermore, the binding affinities of the terpenes increased upon conjugating the peptides with the terpenes. In order to further investigate the specificity toward EphA2 kinase domain, we also examined the binding interactions of the terpenes conjugated to VPWXE (x = norleucine), as VPWXE has been shown to bind to other RTKs. Our results indicated that the terpenes conjugated to SWLAY in particular showed high efficacy toward binding to the KBD. We also designed conjugates where in the peptide portion and the terpenes were separated by a butyl (C4) group linker to examine if the binding interactions could be enhanced. Docking studies showed that the conjugates with linkers had enhanced binding with the LBD compared to those without linkers, though binding remained slightly higher without linkers toward the KBD. As a proof of concept, maslinate and oleanolate conjugates of each of the peptides were then tested with F98 tumor cells which are known to overexpress EphA2 receptor. Results indicated that the oleanolate-amido-SWLAY conjugates were efficacious in reducing the cell proliferation of the tumor cells and may be potentially developed and further studied for targeting tumor cells overexpressing the EphA2 receptor. To test if these conjugates could bind to the receptor and potentially function as kinase inhibitors, we conducted SPR analysis and ADP-Glo assay. Our results indicated that OA conjugate with SWLAY showed the highest inhibition.
methodsDocking studies were carried out using AutoDock Vina, v.1.2.0; Molecular Dynamics and MMGBSA calculations were carried out through Schrodinger Software DESMOND.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.