Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37291428›Full record

ArticleJournal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract2023

The Role of Probe-Based Confocal Laser Endomicroscopy (pCLE) in the Diagnosis of Sustained Clinical Complete Response Under Watch-and-Wait Strategy After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy for Locally Advanced Rectal Adenocarcinoma: a Score Validation.

Adriana Vaz Safatle-Ribeiro, Ulysses Ribeiro, John Lata, Elisa Ryoka Baba, Luciano Lenz, Bruno da Costa Martins, Fábio Kawaguti, Renata Nobre Moura, Caterina Pennacchi, Carla Gusmon and 8 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02284802 (Early Detection of Tumors of the Digestive Tract by Confocal Endomicroscopy), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02284802 nacompletednot on this map

Early Detection of Tumors of the Digestive Tract by Confocal Endomicroscopy

TypeinterventionalSponsorFauze Maluf FilhoRan2014 to 2023Enrolled87ConditionsBarrett Esophagus, Gastric Antrectomy Partial, Biliary Duct Stricture, Pancreatic Duct StrictureArmsConfocal endomicroscopy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy for prediction of uterine rejection in a patient submitted to live-donor uterus transplantation.Arquivos brasileiros de cirurgia digestiva : ABCD = Brazilian archives of digestive surgery · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Adriana Vaz Safatle-RibeiroEndoscopy Unit, Department of Gastroenterology, Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo, Hospital das Clínicas da Universidade de São Paulo (ICESP-HCFMUSP), São Paulo, Brazil. adriana.safatle@hc.fm.usp.br.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7686-8859
Ulysses RibeiroDigestive Surgery and Colorectal Division, Department of Gastroenterology, Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo, Hospital das Clínicas da Universidade de São Paulo (ICESP-HCFMUSP), São Paulo, Brazil.
John LataEndoscopy Unit, Department of Gastroenterology, Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo, Hospital das Clínicas da Universidade de São Paulo (ICESP-HCFMUSP), São Paulo, Brazil.
Elisa Ryoka BabaEndoscopy Unit, Department of Gastroenterology, Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo, Hospital das Clínicas da Universidade de São Paulo (ICESP-HCFMUSP), São Paulo, Brazil.
Luciano LenzEndoscopy Unit, Department of Gastroenterology, Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo, Hospital das Clínicas da Universidade de São Paulo (ICESP-HCFMUSP), São Paulo, Brazil.
Bruno da Costa MartinsEndoscopy Unit, Department of Gastroenterology, Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo, Hospital das Clínicas da Universidade de São Paulo (ICESP-HCFMUSP), São Paulo, Brazil.
Fábio KawagutiEndoscopy Unit, Department of Gastroenterology, Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo, Hospital das Clínicas da Universidade de São Paulo (ICESP-HCFMUSP), São Paulo, Brazil.
Renata Nobre MouraEndoscopy Unit, Department of Gastroenterology, Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo, Hospital das Clínicas da Universidade de São Paulo (ICESP-HCFMUSP), São Paulo, Brazil.
Caterina PennacchiEndoscopy Unit, Department of Gastroenterology, Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo, Hospital das Clínicas da Universidade de São Paulo (ICESP-HCFMUSP), São Paulo, Brazil.
Carla GusmonEndoscopy Unit, Department of Gastroenterology, Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo, Hospital das Clínicas da Universidade de São Paulo (ICESP-HCFMUSP), São Paulo, Brazil.
Marcelo Simas de LimaEndoscopy Unit, Department of Gastroenterology, Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo, Hospital das Clínicas da Universidade de São Paulo (ICESP-HCFMUSP), São Paulo, Brazil.
Gustavo Andrade de PauloEndoscopy Unit, Department of Gastroenterology, Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo, Hospital das Clínicas da Universidade de São Paulo (ICESP-HCFMUSP), São Paulo, Brazil.
Caio Sérgio NahasDigestive Surgery and Colorectal Division, Department of Gastroenterology, Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo, Hospital das Clínicas da Universidade de São Paulo (ICESP-HCFMUSP), São Paulo, Brazil.
Carlos Frederico MarquesDigestive Surgery and Colorectal Division, Department of Gastroenterology, Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo, Hospital das Clínicas da Universidade de São Paulo (ICESP-HCFMUSP), São Paulo, Brazil.
Antônio Rocco ImperialeDigestive Surgery and Colorectal Division, Department of Gastroenterology, Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo, Hospital das Clínicas da Universidade de São Paulo (ICESP-HCFMUSP), São Paulo, Brazil.
Guilherme C CottiDigestive Surgery and Colorectal Division, Department of Gastroenterology, Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo, Hospital das Clínicas da Universidade de São Paulo (ICESP-HCFMUSP), São Paulo, Brazil.
Fauze Maluf-FilhoEndoscopy Unit, Department of Gastroenterology, Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo, Hospital das Clínicas da Universidade de São Paulo (ICESP-HCFMUSP), São Paulo, Brazil.
Sérgio Carlos NahasDigestive Surgery and Colorectal Division, Department of Gastroenterology, Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo, Hospital das Clínicas da Universidade de São Paulo (ICESP-HCFMUSP), São Paulo, Brazil.
Universidade de São Paulo · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWatch-and-wait strategy has been increasingly accepted for patients with clinical complete response (cCR) after multimodal treatment for locally advanced rectal adenocarcinoma. Close follow-up is essential to the early detection of local regrowth. It was previously demonstrated that probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy (pCLE) scoring using the combination of epithelial and vascular features might improve the diagnostic accuracy of cCR.

aimTo validate the pCLE scoring system in the assessment of patients with cCR after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRxt) for advanced rectal adenocarcinoma.

methodsDigital rectal examination, pelvic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and pCLE were performed in 43 patients with cCR, who presented either a scar (N = 33; 76.7%) or a small ulcer with no signs of tumor, and/or biopsy negative for malignancy (N = 10; 23.3%).

resultsTwenty-five (58.1%) patients were men, and the mean age was 58.4 years. During the follow-up, 12/43 (27.9%) patients presented local regrowth and underwent salvage surgery. There was an association between pCLE diagnostic scoring and final histological report (for patients who underwent surgical resection) or final diagnosis at the latest follow-up (p = 0.0001), while this association was not observed with MRI (p = 0.49). pCLE sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy were 66.7%, 93.5%, 80%, 88.9%, and 86%, respectively. MRI sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy were 66.7%, 48.4%, 66.7%, 78.9%, and 53.5%, respectively.

conclusionspCLE scoring system based on epithelial and vascular features improved the diagnosis of sustained cCR and might be recommended during follow-up. pCLE might add some valuable contribution for identifying local regrowth. Trial Registration This protocol was registered at the Clinical Trials (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT02284802).

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaRectal NeoplasmsChemoradiotherapyCombined Modality TherapyFemaleHumansLasersMaleMiddle AgedNeoadjuvant TherapyNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalTreatment OutcomeWatchful WaitingClinical complete responseConfocal endomicroscopyMagnetic resonance imagingNeoadjuvant chemoradiotherapyRectal cancerRectoscopyWatch and wait

Identifiers

PMID37291428
OpenAlexW4379791572

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.